IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The max_links calculation didn't work particularly well if max_links was
set to a value lower than max_objects.
As soon as repl_chunk->object_count exceeded repl_chunk->max_links, the
chunk would be deemed full, even if there was only one link to send (or
even worse, no links to send). For example, if max_objects=100 and
max_links=10, then it would send back chunks of 10 objects (or 9 objects
and 1 link).
I believe the historic reason this logic exists is to avoid overfilling
the response message. It's hard to tell what the appropriate limit would
be because the total message size would depend on how many attributes
each object has.
I couldn't think of logic that would be suitable for all cases. I toyed
with the idea of working out a percentage of how full the message is.
However, adjusting the max_links doesn't really make sense when the
settings are small enough, e.g. max_objects=100 and max_links=100 is
never going to overfill the message, so there's no reason to alter the
values.
In the end I went with:
- If the user is using non-default values, just use those.
- In the default value case, just use the historic calculation
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12972
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
A source object can potentially link to thousands of target objects.
We have to be careful not to overfill the GetNCChanges response message
with more data than it's possible to send. We also don't want the client
to timeout while we're busy checking the linked attributes. The GET_TGT
support added so far is fairly dumb - this patch extends it to better
handle larger numbers of links.
To do so, this extends the repl_chunk usage so that it also works out if
the current chunk is full of links. Now as soon as the chunk is full of
either links or objects, we stop and send it back.
These changes now mean that we need to also check:
- that all the links for the last source object in the previous chunk
have been sent, before we move on and send the next object. This only
takes effect when immediate_link_sync is configured. It also means
that a chunk in the middle of the replication cycle can now contain
only links, and no objects.
- when GET_TGT is used, we only send back the links that we've verified
the target object for. i.e. if we stop checking links because we timed
out, we only send back the links whose targets were checked.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
To prepare GET_TGT to deal with a large number of links better, there
is now a 'repl_chunk' struct to help keep track of all the factors
relating to the current chunk of replication data (i.e. how many
objects/links we can send and how many we've already processed). This
means we can have a consistent way of working out whether the current
chunk is full (whether that be due to objects, links, or just too much
time taken).
This patch should not alter functionality. This is just a refactor to
add the basic framework, which will be used in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This adds basic DRS_GET_TGT support. If the GET_TGT flag is specified
then the server will use the object cache to store the objects it sends
back. If the target object for a linked attribute is not in the cache
(i.e. it has not been sent already), then it is added to the response
message.
Note that large numbers of linked attributes will not be handled well
yet - the server could potentially try to send more than will fit in a
single repsonse message.
Also note that the client can sometimes set the GET_TGT flag even if the
server is still sending the links last. In this case, we know the client
supports GET_TGT so it's safe to send the links interleaved with the
source objects (the alternative of fetching the target objects but not
sending the links until last doesn't really make any sense).
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Instead of sending all the linked attributes at the end, add a
configurable option to send the links in each replication chunk.
The benefits of this approach are:
- it can reduce memory overhead, as we don't have to keep all the links
in memory over the entire replication cycle.
- the client should never end up knowing about objects but not their
links. (Although we're not sure that this has actually resulted in
replication problems, i.e. missing links).
Note that until we support GET_TGT, this approach can mean we now send
a link where the client doesn't know about the target object, causing
the client to siliently drop that linked attribute. Hence, this option
is switched off by default.
Implementation-wise, this code works fairly the same as before. Instead
of sorting the entire getnc_state->la_sorted array at the end and then
splitting it up over chunks, we now split the links up over chunks and
then sort them when we copy them into the message. This should be OK, as
I believe the MS-DRSR Doc says the links in the message should be sorted
(rather than sorting *all* the links overall). Windows behaviour seems
to chunk the links based on USN and then sort them.
getnc_state->la_idx now tracks which links in getnc_state->la_list[]
have already been sent (instead of tracking getnc_state->la_sorted).
This means the la_sorted array no longer needs to be stored in
getnc_state and we can free the array's memory once we've copied the
links into the message. Unfortunately, the link_given/link_total debug
no longer reports the correct information, so I've moved these into
getncchanges_state struct (and now free the struct a bit later so it's
safe to reference in the debug).
The vampire_dc testenv has been updated to use this new behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Douglas Bagnall <dbagnall@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 15 10:07:33 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
There's not really much after the continue that we're skipping now. We
can just flip the logic and avoid the continue.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Basically, everytime we try to add an object to the response, we want
to:
- Build it (i.e. pack it into an RPC message format)
- Add it to our object-cache if we're keeping one
- Add any ancestors needed for the client to resolve it (if GET_ANC)
GET_TGT is going to use the exact same code, so split this out into a
separate function, rather than duplicating it.
The GET_ANC case also uses almost identical code, but it differs in a
couple of minor aspects. I've left this as is for now, as I'm not sure
if this is by accident or by design.
Because all the memory was talloc'd off the 'obj' variable, we now need
to replace it with a tmp TALLOC_CTX.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Fifteen parameters seems a bit excessive. Instead, pass it the structs
containing the information it cares about.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This TODO was added in 2009 (before Samba supported linked_attributes
in getNCChanges())
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Adding GET_TGT support is going to make things more complicated, and I
think we are going to struggle to do this without refactoring things a
bit.
This patch adds a helper struct to store state related to a single
GetNCChanges chunk. I plan to add to this with things like max_links,
max_objects, etc, which will cutdown on the number of variables/
parameters we pass around.
I found the double-pointer logic where we add objects to the response
confusing - hopefully this refactor simplifies things slightly, and it
allows us to reuse the code for the GET_TGT case.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
If the current object had already been sent as an ancestor, we were
duplicating the code that added its links and updated the HWM mark.
We want these to occur when we reach the place where the object's USN
naturally occurs.
Instead of duplicating this code, we can just skip the call to
get_nc_changes_build_object() if the object has already been sent.
There is already an existing 'nothing to send'/continue case after we've
updated the highwater mark.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Currently we add links each time we send an object, but we don't
actually send these links until the end of the replication cycle.
In subsequent patches we want the links to be sent in the same chunk as
their source object, ideally in as close to USN order as possible.
Processing ancestors complicates this a bit, as the ancestor will have a
higher USN than what we're currently up to, and so potentially will the
ancestor's links.
This patch moves where the ancestor's links get added to the
getnc_state->la_list. The ancestor's links now get added when the object
would normally get sent based purely on its USN (we update the highwater
mark at this point too).
This should not affect functionality, i.e. because we send all the links
at the end, it should make no difference at what point they get added to
the list.
This duplicates a tiny bit of code, but this will be cleaned up in the
next patch.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
When we add GET_TGT support, it's going to need to reuse all this code
(i.e. to add any ancestors of the link target). This also trims down
the rather large dcesrv_drsuapi_DsGetNCChanges() function a bit.
Note also fixed a compiler warning in the WERR_DS_DRA_INCONSISTENT_DIT
error block which may have caused issues previously (statement was
terminated by a ',' rather than a ';').
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Longer-term we want to split up the links so that they're sent over
multiple GetNCChanges response messages. So it makes sense to split this
code out into its own function. In the short-term, this removes some of
the complexity from dcesrv_drsuapi_DsGetNCChanges() so that the function
is not quite so big.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
When we add GET_TGT support we will reuse the ancestor cache and it
should work the same way - if we've already sent an object because it
was needed for resolving a child object or a link target, then there's
no point sending it again.
This just renames anc_cache --> obj_cache.
An extra is_get_anc flag has been added to getnc_state - once GET_TGT
support is added, we can't assume GET_ANC based solely on the existence
of the obj_cache.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This is used in the client and in the server
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Add some test cases to check for requests for invalid/non-existent DNs.
This exercises the first return case added in commit:
s4-drsuapi: Refuse to replicate an NC is that not actually an NC
I've also updated the error code returned here to match Windows.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
We were creating the getnc_state (and storing it on the connection)
before we had done some basic checks that the request was valid. If the
request was not valid and we returned early with an error, then the
partially-initialized getnc_state was left hanging on the connection.
The next request that got sent on the connection would try to use this,
rather than creating a new getnc_state from scratch.
The main side-effect of this was if you sent an invalid GetNCChanges
request twice, then it could be rejected the first time and accepted the
second time.
Note that although an invalid request was accepted, it would typically
not return any objects, so it would not actually leak any secure
information.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
The existing SOURCE_DISABLED error code doesn't seem to make a lot of
sense. Window sends back an ACCESS_DENIED error in the same situation,
which seems more appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This prevents replication of an OU, you must replicate a whole NC per Windows 2012R2
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Trying to use bstate->sam_ctx_system by mistake can cause crashes if
non-admin users replicate. To avoid this problem we use the sam_ctx
variable, however it wasn't used consistently everywhere. Replace the
remaining references to b_state->sam_ctx to avoid potential confusion.
This change was made based on review feedback from Metze.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Users who are not administrator do not get b_state->sam_ctx_system filled in.
We should probably use the 'sam_ctx' variable in all cases (instead of
b_state->sam_ctx*), but I'll make this change in a separate patch, so
that the bug fix remains independent from other tidy-ups.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12946
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
This helps us know what process model is required and what one is in use.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12939
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jul 28 04:12:08 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
If we share the single process RPC servers with the multi-process RPC servers
on the same endpoint, they will default to running in an single process
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12939
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This was added in 4cc6b5a69b but the very next commit
(f1c6bab60e) removed where it was set, which meant the variable
was always false and seemingly pointless.
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This splits out the username into the input, mapped and obtained
just as we do elsewhere.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Log NETLOGON authentication activity by instrumenting the
netr_ServerAuthenticate3 processing.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12865
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Modified to use constant AS_SYSTEM_MAGIC_PATH_TOKEN instead of string literal
"/root/ncalrpc_as_system"
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12865
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
This should not happen, but we have seen this happen in autobuild
before the whole-DB locking issues were resolved by
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12858
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
There's no point in creating a temporary ldb_context as
all direct callers already have a valid struct ldb_context for
the local sam.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Log details of the remote machine when bad credentials received.
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This matches a Windows Server, at least if it is itself a
DC of the forest root and the requested domain is the local domain of the DC.
Both constraints are true on a Samba AD DC, as we don't really support
trusts yet.
Pair-Programmed-With: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jun 9 17:06:04 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
This has been the cause of a large number of flakey autobuilds. Every
now and again dns_name_equal would not be equal between two empty
strings, thus causing failures.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12813
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 1 19:34:38 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Prior to this patch, any REPL_SECRETS could be filtered accidentally.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We eliminate a small race between GUID -> DN and ensure RODC can only
reset bad password count on accounts it is allowed to cache locally.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This allows you to forward bad password count resets to 0. Currently,
there is a missing access check for the RODC to ensure it only applies
to cached users (msDS-Allowed-Password-Replication-Group).
(further patches still need to address forcing a RWDC contact)
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
