IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Most tests were prepared in advance, but we left these ones to test
the change.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We have two sets of tests: one that will succeed, and one that is going
to remain a knownfail. The latter involves Resource Attribute ACEs that
have the TX type, meaning "byte string".
In MS-DTYP, a bytestring is defined like "#6869210a", with a hash,
followed by an even number of hex digits. In other places on the web, it
is mentioned that zeroes in the string can be replaced by hashes, like so
"#686921#a". We discover via indirect fuzzing that a TX RA ACE can also
take bare integers, like "6869210a" or "2023". As it would be tricky to
support this, and there is no evidence of this occurring in the wild, we
will probably leave this as a knownfail.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
ACL revision 4 (SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_ADS) is effectively a superset
of revision 2 (SECURITY_ACL_REVISION_NT4), so any revision 2
ACL can be called revision 4 without any problem. But not vice versa:
a revision 4 ACL can contain ACE types that a revision 2 ACL can't. The
extra ACE types relate to objects.
Samba currently simplifies things by calling all its ACLs revision 4,
even if (as is commonly the case) the ACLs contain only revision 2 ACEs.
On the other hand, Windows will use revision 2 whenever it can. In other
tests we skip past this by forcing Windows ACLs to v4 before comparison.
This test is to remind us of the incompatibility.
It would not be hard to fix.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If there are multiple identical ACEs in an SDDL ACL, Windows will decode
them all and put extra trailing zeroes at the end of the ACL.
In contrast, Samba will decode the ACEs and not put extra zeroes at the
end.
The problem comes when Samba tries to read a binary ACL from Windows that
has the extra zeroes, because Samba's ACL size calculation is based on
the size of its constituent ACEs, not the ACL size field.
There is no good reason for an ACL to have repeated ACEs, but they could
be added accidentally.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Matches file and directory closes.
Remove knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15423
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 20 02:43:18 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Shows the server crashes if we open a named pipe, do an async read
and then disconnect.
Adds knownfail:
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15423
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We're now able to build it on all linux systems and
the ci runners have at least a 5.4 kernel. That's
all the current vfs_io_uring requires.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Sep 17 18:04:18 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
If nss_winbind is loaded into a process that uses fork multiple times
without any further calls into nss_winbind, wb_atfork_child handler
was using a wb_global_ctx.key that was no longer registered in the
pthread library, so we operated on a slot that was potentially
reused by other libraries or the main application. Which is likely
to cause memory corruption.
So we better don't call pthread_key_delete() in wb_atfork_child().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15464
Reported-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
Tested-by: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Untested code is broken code. For symlinks we need to hand over the
full reparse buffer into symlink_reparse_buffer_parse(), as this is
also used for the smb2 error response handling. For that, the
"reserved" field in [MS-FSCC] 2.1.2.4 Symbolic Link Reparse Data
Buffer is used for the "unparsed" field.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 8 17:24:19 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
The blob was taken from a smbclient allinfo command for a Windows
symlink. Show that reparse_data_buffer_parse() is broken.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This way we can run the tests and more easily put them into knownfail
individually. Before this, everything went into the error category,
which was not so easy to catch in something like knownfail.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
`cache_get_all_attribute_values` returns a dict whereas we need to pass
a list of keys to `remove`. These will be interpolated in the gpdb search.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 28 03:01:22 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
For this we need to stage a Registry.pol file with certificate
autoenrollment enabled, but with checkboxes unticked.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
If certificate templates are added or removed, the autoenroll extension
should react to this and reapply the policy. Previously this wasn't
taken into account.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Ensure that cepces-submit reporting additional templates and re-applying
will enforce the updated policy.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
I don't know whether this applies universally, but in our case the
contents of `es['cACertificate'][0]` are binary, so cleanly converting
to a string fails with the following:
'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0x82 in position 1: invalid start byte
We found a fix to be encoding the certificate to base64 when
constructing the CA list.
Section 4.4.5.2 of MS-CAESO also suggests that the content of
`cACertificate` is binary (OCTET string).
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
This fails all GPO-related tests that call `gpupdate --rsop`.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Nagy <gabriel.nagy@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 24 03:47:08 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Can Samba understand Windows security descriptors? Does it parse SDDL
the same way?
Here we test on over 7000 SDDL/descriptor pairs and find the answer
is pleasing. In later commits we will add more tests using different
classes of ACE.
The test cases are derived from fuzz seeds, exported to Windows via
the script in the last commit, with the Windows descriptor bytes found
using libcli/security/tests/windows/windows-sddl-test.py.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Soon we will get Conditional ACEs and Resource Attribute ACES, each of
which have trailing bytes at the end of the ACE. Here's a diagram:
____ The ACE size field may indicate a size bigger
.type / | than the known parts, even when you take
.flags / | rounding to a multiple of four into account.
.size --' | This extra data is meaningful in some ACEs.
.access_mask |
.trustee (sid) _| <- known data ends here.
:
"coda" ___: <- the trailing part, Zero size unless the size
field points beyond the end of the known data.
Probably empty for ordinary ACE types.
Until now we have thrown away these extra bytes, because they have no
meaning in the ACE types we recognise. But with conditional and
resource attribute ACEs we need to catch and process these bytes, so
we add an extra field for that.
Thus we can drop the manually written ndr_pull_security_ace() that
discarded the trailing bytes, because we just allow it to be pulled
into an unused blob. In the very common case, the blob will be empty.
Microsoft does not use a common name across different ACE types to
describe this end-data -- "coda" is a Samba term.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
With no call to report_time() preceding it,
PlainFormatter.start_testsuite() would always claim that no time had
elapsed prior to the first testsuite starting to run. This gave a
misleading impression of the time spent running the first testsuite. Now
the time will be consistent with that reported for subsequent
testsuites, and will properly include any time that test environments
took to start up.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 22 00:36:52 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Although report_time() would output the time in UTC, it neglected to
specify the timezone offset. Thus subunithelper.parse_results() would
interpret the time string it was given as being in local time.
TestProtocolClient.time() then converted that *back* into UTC, giving an
incorrect result (unless UTC is your local timezone).
Fix this by having report_time() indicate that the time zone is UTC.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15162
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This field is supposed to be aligned to eight bytes, but the ‘dlong’
type is aligned to only four bytes. This discrepancy resulted in claims
being encoded and decoded incorrectly.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15452
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Remove the now unneeded req->xxx = NULL assignments (and the
deliberately bogus req->session = (void *)0xDEADBEEF one
used to demonstrate the bug).
Remove knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15432
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 15 12:06:36 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Found by Robert Morris <rtm@lcs.mit.edu>.
Adds knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15432
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <nopower@samba.org>
Remove knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15430
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 14 19:52:49 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
Robert Morris <rtm@lcs.mit.edu> noticed a missing
return in reply_exit_done().
Adds knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15430
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Noel Power <npower@samba.org>
Robert Morris <rtm@lcs.mit.edu> noticed that in the case
where srvstr_pull_req_talloc() is being called with
buffer remaining == 0, we don't NULL out the destination
pointed which is *always* done in the codepaths inside
pull_string_talloc(). This prevents a crash in the caller.
Remove knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15420
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Shows that we indirect through an uninitialized pointer and the client crashes
it's own smbd.
Add knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15420
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
If an authentication policy enforces a maximum TGT lifetime for a
Protected User, that limit should stand in place of the four-hour limit
usually applied to Protected Users; we should nevertheless continue to
ensure that forwardable or proxiable tickets are not issued to such
users.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We should not have two unrelated classes both named SimpleKerberosTests.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is the version we test with in CI after the image update
in the next commit. This addresses the issues that were
fixed in CVE-2022-37967 (KrbtgtFullPacSignature) and ensures
that Samba builds against the MIT version that allows us to
avoid that attack.
The hooks to allow these expectations to be disabled in the tests
are kept for now, to allow this to be reverted or to test
older servers.
With MIT 1.21 as the new test standard for the MIT KDC build
we update the knownfail_mit_kdc - this was required regadless
after the CI image update.
Any update to the CI image, even an unrelated one, brings in
a new MIT Krb5, version 1.21-3 in this case. This has new
behaviour that needs to be noted in the knownfail files or
else the tests, which haven't changed, will fail and
pipelines won't pass.
(The image generated by the earlier bootstrap commit brought
in krb5-1.21-2 which was buggy with CVE-2023-39975)
Further tweaks to tests or the server should reduce the number
of knownfail entries, but this keeps the pipelines passing for now.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15231
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
