IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This makes the test independent from the developers environment.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Currently it displays if a domain is online or offline which is wrong.
It tells us if we maintain an active connection to the domain or not.
Users are confused if they read offline because the think winbind is not
functional with that domain.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 16 14:46:43 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13337
Signed-off-by: Björn Baumbach <bb@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 16 07:48:37 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
smbd_smb2_flush_recv() expects nterror in tevent_req, and otherwise
aborts in tevent_req_is_nterror()
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13338
Signed-off-by: Anton Nefedov <anton.nefedov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It's important to have them separated from make_{server,session}_info_guest(),
because there's a fundamental difference between anonymous (the client requested
no authentication) and guest (the server lies about the authentication failure).
When it's really an anonymous connection, we should reflect that in the
resulting session info.
This should fix a problem where Windows 10 tries to join
a Samba hosted NT4 domain and has SMB2/3 enabled.
We no longer return SMB_SETUP_GUEST or SMB2_SESSION_FLAG_IS_GUEST
for true anonymous connections.
The commit message from a few commit before shows the resulting
auth_session_info change.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Mar 16 03:03:31 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
For unauthenticated connections we should default to a
session info with an anonymous nt token.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We only need to adjust sanitized_username in order to keep the same behaviour.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
These functions make it possible to construct a full auth_session_info
from the information available from an auth_user_info_dc structure.
This has all the logic from create_local_token() that is used
to transform a auth_serversupplied_info to a full auth_session_info.
In order to workarround the restriction that auth_user_info_dc
doesn't contain hints for the unix token/name, we use
the special S-1-5-88 (Unix_NFS) sids:
- S-1-5-88-1-Y gives the uid=Y
- S-1-5-88-2-Y gives the gid=Y
- S-1-5-88-3-Y gives flags=Y AUTH3_UNIX_HINT_*
The currently implemented flags are:
- AUTH3_UNIX_HINT_QUALIFIED_NAME
unix_name = DOMAIN+ACCOUNT
- AUTH3_UNIX_HINT_ISLOLATED_NAME
unix_name = ACCOUNT
- AUTH3_UNIX_HINT_DONT_TRANSLATE_FROM_SIDS
Don't translate the nt token SIDS into uid/gids
using sid mapping.
- AUTH3_UNIX_HINT_DONT_TRANSLATE_TO_SIDS
Don't translate the unix token uid/gids to S-1-22-X-Y SIDS
- AUTH3_UNIX_HINT_DONT_EXPAND_UNIX_GROUPS
The unix token won't get expanded gid values
from getgroups_unix_user()
By using the hints it is possible to keep the current logic
where an authentication backend provides uid/gid values and
the unix name.
Note the S-1-5-88-* SIDS never appear in the final security_token.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We should add Builtin_Guests depending on the current token
not based on 'is_guest'. Even authenticated users can be member
a guest related group and therefore get Builtin_Guests.
Sadly we still need to use 'is_guest' within create_local_nt_token()
as we only have S-1-22-* SIDs there and still need to
add Builtin_Guests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We should not crash if we're called with NULL.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
finalize_local_nt_token() will be used in another place,
were we don't want to add local groups in a following commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
The primary gid might not be in the gid array.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13328
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 15 20:57:44 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
This catches more errors and triggers retry as appropriate.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
The calls were missing the negation operator, a retry should be
attempted is the binding handle got somehow disconnected behind the
scenes and is NOT connected.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
To consolidate the error handling for RPC calls, add the binding handle
as an additional argument to reset_cm_connection_on_error().
All callers pass NULL for now, so no change in behaviour up to here.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
NT_STATUS_RPC_SEC_PKG_ERROR is returned by the server if the server
doesn't know the server-side netlogon credentials anymore, eg after a
reboot. If this happens we must force a full netlogon reauth.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This ensures we use the same disconnect logic in the reconnect backend,
which calls reconnect_need_retry(), and in the dual_srv frontend which
calls reset_cm_connection_on_error.
Both reset_cm_connection_on_error() and reconnect_need_retry() are very
similar, both return a bool indicating whether a retry should be
attempted, unfortunately the functions have a different default return,
so I don't dare unifying them, but instead just call one from the other.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
reconnect_need_retry() already checks for this error, it surfaces up
from tstream_smbXcli_np as a mapping for EIO.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
ldap_reconnect_need_retry() is a copy of reconnect_need_retry() minus
the RPC connection invalidation.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Right now I don't see a way to actually force a re-serverauth
from the client side as long as an entry in netlogon_creds_cli.tdb
exists. cm_connect_netlogon goes through invalidate_cm_connection, and
this wipes our wish to force a reauthenticatoin. Keep this intact until
we actually did reauthenticate.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is a pure testing utility that will garble the netlogon_creds_cli
session_key. This creates a similar effect to our schannel credentials
as does a domain controller reboot.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13332
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 13 23:48:28 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
The name UF_TRUST_ACCOUNT_MASK better reflects the use case and it's not
yet used.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11343
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Mar 13 16:06:10 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
This is not strictly needed to fig bug 13272, but it makes sense to also
fix this while fixing the overall ACL checking logic.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is used to pass information about which password change operation (change
or reset) the acl module validated, down to the password_hash module.
It's very important that both modules treat the request identical.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Will be used to pass "user password change" vs "password reset" from the
ACL to the password_hash module, ensuring both modules treat the request
identical.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is needed, because a later commit will let the acl module add a
control to the change request msg and we must ensure that this is only
done once.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This change ensures we correctly treat the following LDIF
dn: cn=testuser,cn=users,...
changetype: modify
delete: userPassword
add: userPassword
userPassword: thatsAcomplPASS1
as a password reset. Because delete and add element counts are both
one, the ACL module wrongly treated this as a password change
request.
For a password change we need at least one value to delete and one value
to add. This patch ensures we correctly check attributes and their
values.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13272
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
