IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Gary Lockyer <gary@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jan 6 03:12:20 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
Coverity does not get that for (rc!=0) gnutls_error_to_ntstatus()
never returns NT_STATUS_OK
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Use generate_random_buffer() directly on the talloc'ed buffer
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
same as the previous commit, just for python's testparm code
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10560
Signed-off-by: Bjoern Jacke <bjacke@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Björn Jacke <bjacke@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jan 3 22:19:47 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
When Samba is running as a domain controller and the "vfs objects"
parameter is not set, then the dfs_samba4 and acl_xattr modules are
automatically enabled.
However, if the "vfs objects" is defined, then the setting is left
as-is. This means that attempts to us other VFS modules have the side
effect of disabling the dfs_samba4 and acl_xattr modules, causing
unexpected behaviour, which is then blamed on the VFS modules that were
explicitly defined.
This change ensures that when running as a domain controller, Samba logs
an error if the required VFS modules are not enabled by an explicit
"vfs objects" definition.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10560
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Björn Jacke <bjacke@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jan 3 01:30:24 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
See the comments added to the tests.
It may be possible to rewrite these so they do something sane for
IPv6... some other time.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14227
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Amitay Isaacs <amitay@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jan 3 00:00:55 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
ss added square brackets around IPv6 addresses in versions > 4.12.0
via commit aba9c23a6e1cb134840c998df14888dca469a485. CentOS 7 added
this feature somewhere mid-release. So, backward compatibility is
obviously needed.
As per the comment protocol/protocol_util.c should probably print and
parse such square brackets. However, for backward compatibility the
brackets would have to be stripped in both places in
update_tickles()... or added to the ss output when missing. Best to
leave this until we have a connection tracking daemon.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14227
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Jan 1 12:04:52 UTC 2020 on sn-devel-184
When contending a WRITE with an existing READ, the contender puts
himself into the exclusive slot, waiting for the READers to go
away. If the async lock request is canceled before we got the lock, we
need to remove ourselves again. This is done in the destructor of the
g_lock_lock_state. In the successful case, the destructor needs to go
away.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Dec 22 18:57:17 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
This walks different code paths in the subsequent locker. And the one
that we did not test so far is in fact buggy
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Add parameter zfsacl:map_dacl_protected to address issue preventing Windows Clients
from disabling inheritance on ACLs. FreeBSD does not currently expose the ACL_PROTECTED
NFS4.1 flag, but it does expose ACE4_INHERITED_ACE. When the parameter is enabled,
map the absence of ACE4_INHERITED_ACE to SEC_DESC_DACL_PROTECTED.
See also the discussion at
https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/merge_requests/719
Signed-off-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 20 23:24:54 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Not used for now, that comes next.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Now that we parse nfs4_params in the VFS connect in this module, we can pass it
to smb_set_nt_acl_nfs4() which avoids having smb_set_nt_acl_nfs4() parse
it *every time* it's called.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Convert zfsacl:denymissingspecial so that the parameter loads on connect.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Walker <awalker@ixsystems.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 20 13:06:20 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-184
Now that all callers pass in a valid session_info, we can remove handling of
session_info=NULL. Add an assert(session_info != NULL) just in case... :)
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Previously posixacl.py passed None as session_info object from
get_session_info().
That meant that the if/else branch referring to session_info:
if nwrap_winbind_active or session_info:
self.assertEquals(posix_acl.acl[1].a_perm, 7)
else:
self.assertEquals(posix_acl.acl[1].a_perm, 6)
must be tweaked to take into account that session info is now either
* a system session_info in which case we must continue to use the if branch in
the code, or
* a user session_info in which case we must continue to go through the else
branch
Using
is_user_session = not session_info.security_token.is_system()
in place of just "session_info" does the trick.
Cf the classes SessionedPosixAclMappingTests and
UnixSessionedPosixAclMappingTests in posixacl.py, those are the ones that
trigger test execution with a user session.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
