License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 17:07:57 +03:00
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
comment "Processor Type"
# Select CPU types depending on the architecture selected. This selects
# which CPUs we support in the kernel image, and the compiler instruction
# optimiser behaviour.
2006-09-26 12:37:36 +04:00
# ARM7TDMI
config CPU_ARM7TDMI
2015-05-26 17:40:16 +03:00
bool
2006-09-27 20:44:39 +04:00
depends on !MMU
2006-09-26 12:37:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_LV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2006-09-26 12:37:36 +04:00
help
A 32-bit RISC microprocessor based on the ARM7 processor core
which has no memory control unit and cache.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM7TDMI processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# ARM720T
config CPU_ARM720T
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2006-08-28 15:51:20 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_ABRT_LV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WT if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WT if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
A 32-bit RISC processor with 8kByte Cache, Write Buffer and
MMU built around an ARM7TDMI core.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM720T processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2006-09-26 12:37:50 +04:00
# ARM740T
config CPU_ARM740T
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2006-09-27 20:44:39 +04:00
depends on !MMU
2006-09-26 12:37:50 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
select CPU_ABRT_LV4T
2013-01-15 16:07:40 +04:00
select CPU_CACHE_V4
2006-09-26 12:37:50 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MPU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-09-26 12:37:50 +04:00
help
A 32-bit RISC processor with 8KB cache or 4KB variants,
write buffer and MPU(Protection Unit) built around
an ARM7TDMI core.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM740T processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2006-09-26 12:38:05 +04:00
# ARM9TDMI
config CPU_ARM9TDMI
2015-05-26 17:40:16 +03:00
bool
2006-09-27 20:44:39 +04:00
depends on !MMU
2006-09-26 12:38:05 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
2006-09-28 16:46:16 +04:00
select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
2006-09-26 12:38:05 +04:00
select CPU_CACHE_V4
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2006-09-26 12:38:05 +04:00
help
A 32-bit RISC microprocessor based on the ARM9 processor core
which has no memory control unit and cache.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM9TDMI processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# ARM920T
config CPU_ARM920T
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2006-08-28 15:51:20 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
The ARM920T is licensed to be produced by numerous vendors,
2009-10-21 05:27:01 +04:00
and is used in the Cirrus EP93xx and the Samsung S3C2410.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
Say Y if you want support for the ARM920T processor.
Otherwise, say N.
# ARM922T
config CPU_ARM922T
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2006-08-28 15:51:20 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
The ARM922T is a version of the ARM920T, but with smaller
instruction and data caches. It is used in Altera's
2007-05-12 00:01:28 +04:00
Excalibur XA device family and Micrel's KS8695 Centaur.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
Say Y if you want support for the ARM922T processor.
Otherwise, say N.
# ARM925T
config CPU_ARM925T
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2006-08-28 15:51:20 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
The ARM925T is a mix between the ARM920T and ARM926T, but with
different instruction and data caches. It is used in TI's OMAP
device family.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM925T processor.
Otherwise, say N.
# ARM926T
config CPU_ARM926T
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5TJ
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
This is a variant of the ARM920. It has slightly different
instruction sequences for cache and TLB operations. Curiously,
there is no documentation on it at the ARM corporate website.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM926T processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2009-03-25 14:10:01 +03:00
# FA526
config CPU_FA526
bool
select CPU_32v4
select CPU_ABRT_EV4
select CPU_CACHE_FA
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2009-03-25 14:10:01 +03:00
select CPU_COPY_FA if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2009-03-25 14:10:01 +03:00
select CPU_TLB_FA if MMU
help
The FA526 is a version of the ARMv4 compatible processor with
Branch Target Buffer, Unified TLB and cache line size 16.
Say Y if you want support for the FA526 processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2006-09-26 12:38:18 +04:00
# ARM940T
config CPU_ARM940T
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2006-09-27 20:44:39 +04:00
depends on !MMU
2006-09-26 12:38:18 +04:00
select CPU_32v4T
2006-09-28 16:46:16 +04:00
select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
2006-09-26 12:38:18 +04:00
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
select CPU_CP15_MPU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-09-26 12:38:18 +04:00
help
ARM940T is a member of the ARM9TDMI family of general-
2006-11-30 07:22:59 +03:00
purpose microprocessors with MPU and separate 4KB
2006-09-26 12:38:18 +04:00
instruction and 4KB data cases, each with a 4-word line
length.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM940T processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2006-09-26 12:38:32 +04:00
# ARM946E-S
config CPU_ARM946E
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2006-09-27 20:44:39 +04:00
depends on !MMU
2006-09-26 12:38:32 +04:00
select CPU_32v5
2006-09-28 16:46:16 +04:00
select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
2006-09-26 12:38:32 +04:00
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
select CPU_CP15_MPU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-09-26 12:38:32 +04:00
help
ARM946E-S is a member of the ARM9E-S family of high-
performance, 32-bit system-on-chip processor solutions.
The TCM and ARMv5TE 32-bit instruction set is supported.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM946E-S processor.
Otherwise, say N.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# ARM1020 - needs validating
config CPU_ARM1020
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
The ARM1020 is the 32K cached version of the ARM10 processor,
with an addition of a floating-point unit.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM1020 processor.
Otherwise, say N.
# ARM1020E - needs validating
config CPU_ARM1020E
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
depends on n
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_V4WT
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# ARM1022E
config CPU_ARM1022
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV4T
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU # can probably do better
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
The ARM1022E is an implementation of the ARMv5TE architecture
based upon the ARM10 integer core with a 16KiB L1 Harvard cache,
embedded trace macrocell, and a floating-point unit.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM1022E processor.
Otherwise, say N.
# ARM1026EJ-S
config CPU_ARM1026
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5T # But need Jazelle, but EV5TJ ignores bit 10
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU # can probably do better
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
The ARM1026EJ-S is an implementation of the ARMv5TEJ architecture
based upon the ARM10 integer core.
Say Y if you want support for the ARM1026EJ-S processor.
Otherwise, say N.
# SA110
config CPU_SA110
2014-02-26 20:39:12 +04:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v3 if ARCH_RPC
select CPU_32v4 if !ARCH_RPC
select CPU_ABRT_EV4
select CPU_CACHE_V4WB
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WB if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
The Intel StrongARM(R) SA-110 is a 32-bit microprocessor and
is available at five speeds ranging from 100 MHz to 233 MHz.
More information is available at
<http://developer.intel.com/design/strong/sa110.htm>.
Say Y if you want support for the SA-110 processor.
Otherwise, say N.
# SA1100
config CPU_SA1100
bool
select CPU_32v4
select CPU_ABRT_EV4
select CPU_CACHE_V4WB
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
[ARM] nommu: defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU
By merging of uClinux/ARM, we need to treat various CPU cores which have
MMU, MPU or even none for memory management. The memory management
coprocessors are controlled by CP15 register set and the ARM core family
can be categorized by 5 groups by the register ;
G-a. CP15 is MMU : 610, 710, 720, 920, 922, 925, 926, 1020, 1020e, 1022,
v6 and the derivations sa1100, sa110, xscale, xsc3.
G-b. CP15 is MPU : 740, 940, 946, 996, 1156.
G-c. CP15 is MPU or MMU : 1026 (selectable by schematic design)
G-d. CP15 is exist, but nothing for memory managemnt : 966, 968.
G-e. no-CP15 : 7tdmi, 9tdmi, 9e, 9ej
This patch defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU. Thus the
family can be defined as :
- CPU_CP15 only : G-d
- CPU_CP15_MMU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-a, G-c(selectable)
- CPU_CP15_MPU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-b, G-c(selectable)
- !CPU_CP15 : G-e
Signed-off-by: Hyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-26 12:36:37 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WB if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# XScale
config CPU_XSCALE
bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5T
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
[ARM] nommu: defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU
By merging of uClinux/ARM, we need to treat various CPU cores which have
MMU, MPU or even none for memory management. The memory management
coprocessors are controlled by CP15 register set and the ARM core family
can be categorized by 5 groups by the register ;
G-a. CP15 is MMU : 610, 710, 720, 920, 922, 925, 926, 1020, 1020e, 1022,
v6 and the derivations sa1100, sa110, xscale, xsc3.
G-b. CP15 is MPU : 740, 940, 946, 996, 1156.
G-c. CP15 is MPU or MMU : 1026 (selectable by schematic design)
G-d. CP15 is exist, but nothing for memory managemnt : 966, 968.
G-e. no-CP15 : 7tdmi, 9tdmi, 9e, 9ej
This patch defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU. Thus the
family can be defined as :
- CPU_CP15 only : G-d
- CPU_CP15_MMU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-a, G-c(selectable)
- CPU_CP15_MPU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-b, G-c(selectable)
- !CPU_CP15 : G-e
Signed-off-by: Hyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-26 12:36:37 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
2006-03-29 00:00:40 +04:00
# XScale Core Version 3
config CPU_XSC3
bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5T
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
[ARM] nommu: defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU
By merging of uClinux/ARM, we need to treat various CPU cores which have
MMU, MPU or even none for memory management. The memory management
coprocessors are controlled by CP15 register set and the ARM core family
can be categorized by 5 groups by the register ;
G-a. CP15 is MMU : 610, 710, 720, 920, 922, 925, 926, 1020, 1020e, 1022,
v6 and the derivations sa1100, sa110, xscale, xsc3.
G-b. CP15 is MPU : 740, 940, 946, 996, 1156.
G-c. CP15 is MPU or MMU : 1026 (selectable by schematic design)
G-d. CP15 is exist, but nothing for memory managemnt : 966, 968.
G-e. no-CP15 : 7tdmi, 9tdmi, 9e, 9ej
This patch defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU. Thus the
family can be defined as :
- CPU_CP15 only : G-d
- CPU_CP15_MMU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-a, G-c(selectable)
- CPU_CP15_MPU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-b, G-c(selectable)
- !CPU_CP15 : G-e
Signed-off-by: Hyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-26 12:36:37 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2006-03-29 00:00:40 +04:00
select IO_36
2009-01-20 09:15:18 +03:00
# Marvell PJ1 (Mohawk)
config CPU_MOHAWK
bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5T
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V4WB if MMU
2009-01-20 09:15:18 +03:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2009-01-20 09:15:18 +03:00
select CPU_TLB_V4WBI if MMU
2007-10-23 23:14:41 +04:00
# Feroceon
config CPU_FEROCEON
bool
select CPU_32v5
select CPU_ABRT_EV5T
select CPU_CACHE_VIVT
2008-04-24 09:31:45 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_FEROCEON if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2008-06-23 00:45:04 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_FEROCEON if MMU
2007-10-23 23:14:41 +04:00
2007-11-06 11:35:40 +03:00
config CPU_FEROCEON_OLD_ID
bool "Accept early Feroceon cores with an ARM926 ID"
depends on CPU_FEROCEON && !CPU_ARM926T
default y
help
This enables the usage of some old Feroceon cores
for which the CPU ID is equal to the ARM926 ID.
Relevant for Feroceon-1850 and early Feroceon-2850.
2010-11-24 06:54:19 +03:00
# Marvell PJ4
config CPU_PJ4
bool
select ARM_THUMBEE
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_V7
2010-11-24 06:54:19 +03:00
2012-10-03 13:58:07 +04:00
config CPU_PJ4B
bool
select CPU_V7
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# ARMv6
config CPU_V6
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
select CPU_32v6
select CPU_ABRT_EV6
select CPU_CACHE_V6
select CPU_CACHE_VIPT
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V6 if MMU
[ARM] nommu: defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU
By merging of uClinux/ARM, we need to treat various CPU cores which have
MMU, MPU or even none for memory management. The memory management
coprocessors are controlled by CP15 register set and the ARM core family
can be categorized by 5 groups by the register ;
G-a. CP15 is MMU : 610, 710, 720, 920, 922, 925, 926, 1020, 1020e, 1022,
v6 and the derivations sa1100, sa110, xscale, xsc3.
G-b. CP15 is MPU : 740, 940, 946, 996, 1156.
G-c. CP15 is MPU or MMU : 1026 (selectable by schematic design)
G-d. CP15 is exist, but nothing for memory managemnt : 966, 968.
G-e. no-CP15 : 7tdmi, 9tdmi, 9e, 9ej
This patch defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU. Thus the
family can be defined as :
- CPU_CP15 only : G-d
- CPU_CP15_MMU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-a, G-c(selectable)
- CPU_CP15_MPU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-b, G-c(selectable)
- !CPU_CP15 : G-e
Signed-off-by: Hyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-26 12:36:37 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
2007-07-20 14:42:57 +04:00
select CPU_HAS_ASID if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_V6
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V6 if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
2005-11-03 18:48:21 +03:00
# ARMv6k
2011-01-17 18:08:32 +03:00
config CPU_V6K
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2011-01-17 18:08:32 +03:00
select CPU_32v6
2011-01-15 19:25:04 +03:00
select CPU_32v6K
2011-01-17 18:08:32 +03:00
select CPU_ABRT_EV6
select CPU_CACHE_V6
select CPU_CACHE_VIPT
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V6 if MMU
2011-01-17 18:08:32 +03:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU
select CPU_HAS_ASID if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_V6
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2011-01-17 18:08:32 +03:00
select CPU_TLB_V6 if MMU
2005-11-03 18:48:21 +03:00
2007-05-09 01:45:26 +04:00
# ARMv7
config CPU_V7
2015-11-25 19:32:21 +03:00
bool
2011-02-09 19:33:46 +03:00
select CPU_32v6K
2007-05-09 01:45:26 +04:00
select CPU_32v7
select CPU_ABRT_EV7
select CPU_CACHE_V7
select CPU_CACHE_VIPT
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_COPY_V6 if MMU
2012-07-12 17:38:46 +04:00
select CPU_CP15_MMU if MMU
select CPU_CP15_MPU if !MMU
2007-07-20 14:43:02 +04:00
select CPU_HAS_ASID if MMU
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select CPU_PABRT_V7
2018-05-14 13:56:36 +03:00
select CPU_SPECTRE if MMU
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2007-05-18 14:25:31 +04:00
select CPU_TLB_V7 if MMU
2007-05-09 01:45:26 +04:00
2013-03-22 00:02:37 +04:00
# ARMv7M
config CPU_V7M
bool
select CPU_32v7M
select CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
2016-08-30 19:31:22 +03:00
select CPU_CACHE_V7M
2013-03-22 00:02:37 +04:00
select CPU_CACHE_NOP
select CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
select CPU_THUMBONLY
2011-12-09 23:52:10 +04:00
config CPU_THUMBONLY
bool
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
select CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2011-12-09 23:52:10 +04:00
# There are no CPUs available with MMU that don't implement an ARM ISA:
depends on !MMU
help
Select this if your CPU doesn't support the 32 bit ARM instructions.
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
config CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
bool
help
Select this if your CPU can support Thumb mode.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# Figure out what processor architecture version we should be using.
# This defines the compiler instruction set which depends on the machine type.
config CPU_32v3
bool
2011-01-17 18:53:56 +03:00
select CPU_USE_DOMAINS if MMU
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
select NEED_KUSER_HELPERS
2014-04-23 01:26:27 +04:00
select TLS_REG_EMUL if SMP || !MMU
lib/GCD.c: use binary GCD algorithm instead of Euclidean
The binary GCD algorithm is based on the following facts:
1. If a and b are all evens, then gcd(a,b) = 2 * gcd(a/2, b/2)
2. If a is even and b is odd, then gcd(a,b) = gcd(a/2, b)
3. If a and b are all odds, then gcd(a,b) = gcd((a-b)/2, b) = gcd((a+b)/2, b)
Even on x86 machines with reasonable division hardware, the binary
algorithm runs about 25% faster (80% the execution time) than the
division-based Euclidian algorithm.
On platforms like Alpha and ARMv6 where division is a function call to
emulation code, it's even more significant.
There are two variants of the code here, depending on whether a fast
__ffs (find least significant set bit) instruction is available. This
allows the unpredictable branches in the bit-at-a-time shifting loop to
be eliminated.
If fast __ffs is not available, the "even/odd" GCD variant is used.
I use the following code to benchmark:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define swap(a, b) \
do { \
a ^= b; \
b ^= a; \
a ^= b; \
} while (0)
unsigned long gcd0(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r;
if (a < b) {
swap(a, b);
}
if (b == 0)
return a;
while ((r = a % b) != 0) {
a = b;
b = r;
}
return b;
}
unsigned long gcd1(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
for (;;) {
a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
if (a == b)
return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
}
}
unsigned long gcd2(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
r &= -r;
while (!(b & r))
b >>= 1;
for (;;) {
while (!(a & r))
a >>= 1;
if (a == b)
return a;
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
a >>= 1;
if (a & r)
a += b;
a >>= 1;
}
}
unsigned long gcd3(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
if (b == 1)
return r & -r;
for (;;) {
a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
if (a == 1)
return r & -r;
if (a == b)
return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
}
}
unsigned long gcd4(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
r &= -r;
while (!(b & r))
b >>= 1;
if (b == r)
return r;
for (;;) {
while (!(a & r))
a >>= 1;
if (a == r)
return r;
if (a == b)
return a;
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
a >>= 1;
if (a & r)
a += b;
a >>= 1;
}
}
static unsigned long (*gcd_func[])(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) = {
gcd0, gcd1, gcd2, gcd3, gcd4,
};
#define TEST_ENTRIES (sizeof(gcd_func) / sizeof(gcd_func[0]))
#if defined(__x86_64__)
#define rdtscll(val) do { \
unsigned long __a,__d; \
__asm__ __volatile__("rdtsc" : "=a" (__a), "=d" (__d)); \
(val) = ((unsigned long long)__a) | (((unsigned long long)__d)<<32); \
} while(0)
static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
{
unsigned long long start, end;
unsigned long long ret;
unsigned long gcd_res;
rdtscll(start);
gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
rdtscll(end);
if (end >= start)
ret = end - start;
else
ret = ~0ULL - start + 1 + end;
*res = gcd_res;
return ret;
}
#else
static inline struct timespec read_time(void)
{
struct timespec time;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &time);
return time;
}
static inline unsigned long long diff_time(struct timespec start, struct timespec end)
{
struct timespec temp;
if ((end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) < 0) {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec - 1;
temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000ULL + end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
} else {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec;
temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
}
return temp.tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + temp.tv_nsec;
}
static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
{
struct timespec start, end;
unsigned long gcd_res;
start = read_time();
gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
end = read_time();
*res = gcd_res;
return diff_time(start, end);
}
#endif
static inline unsigned long get_rand()
{
if (sizeof(long) == 8)
return (unsigned long)rand() << 32 | rand();
else
return rand();
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned int seed = time(0);
int loops = 100;
int repeats = 1000;
unsigned long (*res)[TEST_ENTRIES];
unsigned long long elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
int i, j, k;
for (;;) {
int opt = getopt(argc, argv, "n:r:s:");
/* End condition always first */
if (opt == -1)
break;
switch (opt) {
case 'n':
loops = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'r':
repeats = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 's':
seed = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
break;
default:
/* You won't actually get here. */
break;
}
}
res = malloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * TEST_ENTRIES * loops);
memset(elapsed, 0, sizeof(elapsed));
srand(seed);
for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
unsigned long a = get_rand();
/* Do we have args? */
unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
unsigned long long min_elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
for (k = 0; k < repeats; k++) {
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
unsigned long long tmp = benchmark_gcd_func(gcd_func[i], a, b, &res[j][i]);
if (k == 0 || min_elapsed[i] > tmp)
min_elapsed[i] = tmp;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
elapsed[i] += min_elapsed[i];
}
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
printf("gcd%d: elapsed %llu\n", i, elapsed[i]);
k = 0;
srand(seed);
for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
unsigned long a = get_rand();
unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
for (i = 1; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
if (res[j][i] != res[j][0])
break;
}
if (i < TEST_ENTRIES) {
if (k == 0) {
k = 1;
fprintf(stderr, "Error:\n");
}
fprintf(stderr, "gcd(%lu, %lu): ", a, b);
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
fprintf(stderr, "%ld%s", res[j][i], i < TEST_ENTRIES - 1 ? ", " : "\n");
}
}
if (k == 0)
fprintf(stderr, "PASS\n");
free(res);
return 0;
}
Compiled with "-O2", on "VirtualBox 4.4.0-22-generic #38-Ubuntu x86_64" got:
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 10174
gcd1: elapsed 2120
gcd2: elapsed 2902
gcd3: elapsed 2039
gcd4: elapsed 2812
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9309
gcd1: elapsed 2280
gcd2: elapsed 2822
gcd3: elapsed 2217
gcd4: elapsed 2710
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9589
gcd1: elapsed 2098
gcd2: elapsed 2815
gcd3: elapsed 2030
gcd4: elapsed 2718
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9914
gcd1: elapsed 2309
gcd2: elapsed 2779
gcd3: elapsed 2228
gcd4: elapsed 2709
PASS
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid #defining a CONFIG_ variable]
Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21 03:03:57 +03:00
select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_32v4
bool
2011-01-17 18:53:56 +03:00
select CPU_USE_DOMAINS if MMU
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
select NEED_KUSER_HELPERS
2014-04-23 01:26:27 +04:00
select TLS_REG_EMUL if SMP || !MMU
lib/GCD.c: use binary GCD algorithm instead of Euclidean
The binary GCD algorithm is based on the following facts:
1. If a and b are all evens, then gcd(a,b) = 2 * gcd(a/2, b/2)
2. If a is even and b is odd, then gcd(a,b) = gcd(a/2, b)
3. If a and b are all odds, then gcd(a,b) = gcd((a-b)/2, b) = gcd((a+b)/2, b)
Even on x86 machines with reasonable division hardware, the binary
algorithm runs about 25% faster (80% the execution time) than the
division-based Euclidian algorithm.
On platforms like Alpha and ARMv6 where division is a function call to
emulation code, it's even more significant.
There are two variants of the code here, depending on whether a fast
__ffs (find least significant set bit) instruction is available. This
allows the unpredictable branches in the bit-at-a-time shifting loop to
be eliminated.
If fast __ffs is not available, the "even/odd" GCD variant is used.
I use the following code to benchmark:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define swap(a, b) \
do { \
a ^= b; \
b ^= a; \
a ^= b; \
} while (0)
unsigned long gcd0(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r;
if (a < b) {
swap(a, b);
}
if (b == 0)
return a;
while ((r = a % b) != 0) {
a = b;
b = r;
}
return b;
}
unsigned long gcd1(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
for (;;) {
a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
if (a == b)
return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
}
}
unsigned long gcd2(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
r &= -r;
while (!(b & r))
b >>= 1;
for (;;) {
while (!(a & r))
a >>= 1;
if (a == b)
return a;
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
a >>= 1;
if (a & r)
a += b;
a >>= 1;
}
}
unsigned long gcd3(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
if (b == 1)
return r & -r;
for (;;) {
a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
if (a == 1)
return r & -r;
if (a == b)
return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
}
}
unsigned long gcd4(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
r &= -r;
while (!(b & r))
b >>= 1;
if (b == r)
return r;
for (;;) {
while (!(a & r))
a >>= 1;
if (a == r)
return r;
if (a == b)
return a;
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
a >>= 1;
if (a & r)
a += b;
a >>= 1;
}
}
static unsigned long (*gcd_func[])(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) = {
gcd0, gcd1, gcd2, gcd3, gcd4,
};
#define TEST_ENTRIES (sizeof(gcd_func) / sizeof(gcd_func[0]))
#if defined(__x86_64__)
#define rdtscll(val) do { \
unsigned long __a,__d; \
__asm__ __volatile__("rdtsc" : "=a" (__a), "=d" (__d)); \
(val) = ((unsigned long long)__a) | (((unsigned long long)__d)<<32); \
} while(0)
static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
{
unsigned long long start, end;
unsigned long long ret;
unsigned long gcd_res;
rdtscll(start);
gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
rdtscll(end);
if (end >= start)
ret = end - start;
else
ret = ~0ULL - start + 1 + end;
*res = gcd_res;
return ret;
}
#else
static inline struct timespec read_time(void)
{
struct timespec time;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &time);
return time;
}
static inline unsigned long long diff_time(struct timespec start, struct timespec end)
{
struct timespec temp;
if ((end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) < 0) {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec - 1;
temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000ULL + end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
} else {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec;
temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
}
return temp.tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + temp.tv_nsec;
}
static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
{
struct timespec start, end;
unsigned long gcd_res;
start = read_time();
gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
end = read_time();
*res = gcd_res;
return diff_time(start, end);
}
#endif
static inline unsigned long get_rand()
{
if (sizeof(long) == 8)
return (unsigned long)rand() << 32 | rand();
else
return rand();
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned int seed = time(0);
int loops = 100;
int repeats = 1000;
unsigned long (*res)[TEST_ENTRIES];
unsigned long long elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
int i, j, k;
for (;;) {
int opt = getopt(argc, argv, "n:r:s:");
/* End condition always first */
if (opt == -1)
break;
switch (opt) {
case 'n':
loops = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'r':
repeats = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 's':
seed = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
break;
default:
/* You won't actually get here. */
break;
}
}
res = malloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * TEST_ENTRIES * loops);
memset(elapsed, 0, sizeof(elapsed));
srand(seed);
for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
unsigned long a = get_rand();
/* Do we have args? */
unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
unsigned long long min_elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
for (k = 0; k < repeats; k++) {
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
unsigned long long tmp = benchmark_gcd_func(gcd_func[i], a, b, &res[j][i]);
if (k == 0 || min_elapsed[i] > tmp)
min_elapsed[i] = tmp;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
elapsed[i] += min_elapsed[i];
}
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
printf("gcd%d: elapsed %llu\n", i, elapsed[i]);
k = 0;
srand(seed);
for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
unsigned long a = get_rand();
unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
for (i = 1; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
if (res[j][i] != res[j][0])
break;
}
if (i < TEST_ENTRIES) {
if (k == 0) {
k = 1;
fprintf(stderr, "Error:\n");
}
fprintf(stderr, "gcd(%lu, %lu): ", a, b);
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
fprintf(stderr, "%ld%s", res[j][i], i < TEST_ENTRIES - 1 ? ", " : "\n");
}
}
if (k == 0)
fprintf(stderr, "PASS\n");
free(res);
return 0;
}
Compiled with "-O2", on "VirtualBox 4.4.0-22-generic #38-Ubuntu x86_64" got:
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 10174
gcd1: elapsed 2120
gcd2: elapsed 2902
gcd3: elapsed 2039
gcd4: elapsed 2812
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9309
gcd1: elapsed 2280
gcd2: elapsed 2822
gcd3: elapsed 2217
gcd4: elapsed 2710
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9589
gcd1: elapsed 2098
gcd2: elapsed 2815
gcd3: elapsed 2030
gcd4: elapsed 2718
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9914
gcd1: elapsed 2309
gcd2: elapsed 2779
gcd3: elapsed 2228
gcd4: elapsed 2709
PASS
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid #defining a CONFIG_ variable]
Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21 03:03:57 +03:00
select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
2006-08-28 15:51:20 +04:00
config CPU_32v4T
bool
2011-01-17 18:53:56 +03:00
select CPU_USE_DOMAINS if MMU
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
select NEED_KUSER_HELPERS
2014-04-23 01:26:27 +04:00
select TLS_REG_EMUL if SMP || !MMU
lib/GCD.c: use binary GCD algorithm instead of Euclidean
The binary GCD algorithm is based on the following facts:
1. If a and b are all evens, then gcd(a,b) = 2 * gcd(a/2, b/2)
2. If a is even and b is odd, then gcd(a,b) = gcd(a/2, b)
3. If a and b are all odds, then gcd(a,b) = gcd((a-b)/2, b) = gcd((a+b)/2, b)
Even on x86 machines with reasonable division hardware, the binary
algorithm runs about 25% faster (80% the execution time) than the
division-based Euclidian algorithm.
On platforms like Alpha and ARMv6 where division is a function call to
emulation code, it's even more significant.
There are two variants of the code here, depending on whether a fast
__ffs (find least significant set bit) instruction is available. This
allows the unpredictable branches in the bit-at-a-time shifting loop to
be eliminated.
If fast __ffs is not available, the "even/odd" GCD variant is used.
I use the following code to benchmark:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#define swap(a, b) \
do { \
a ^= b; \
b ^= a; \
a ^= b; \
} while (0)
unsigned long gcd0(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r;
if (a < b) {
swap(a, b);
}
if (b == 0)
return a;
while ((r = a % b) != 0) {
a = b;
b = r;
}
return b;
}
unsigned long gcd1(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
for (;;) {
a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
if (a == b)
return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
}
}
unsigned long gcd2(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
r &= -r;
while (!(b & r))
b >>= 1;
for (;;) {
while (!(a & r))
a >>= 1;
if (a == b)
return a;
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
a >>= 1;
if (a & r)
a += b;
a >>= 1;
}
}
unsigned long gcd3(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
if (b == 1)
return r & -r;
for (;;) {
a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
if (a == 1)
return r & -r;
if (a == b)
return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
}
}
unsigned long gcd4(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
{
unsigned long r = a | b;
if (!a || !b)
return r;
r &= -r;
while (!(b & r))
b >>= 1;
if (b == r)
return r;
for (;;) {
while (!(a & r))
a >>= 1;
if (a == r)
return r;
if (a == b)
return a;
if (a < b)
swap(a, b);
a -= b;
a >>= 1;
if (a & r)
a += b;
a >>= 1;
}
}
static unsigned long (*gcd_func[])(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) = {
gcd0, gcd1, gcd2, gcd3, gcd4,
};
#define TEST_ENTRIES (sizeof(gcd_func) / sizeof(gcd_func[0]))
#if defined(__x86_64__)
#define rdtscll(val) do { \
unsigned long __a,__d; \
__asm__ __volatile__("rdtsc" : "=a" (__a), "=d" (__d)); \
(val) = ((unsigned long long)__a) | (((unsigned long long)__d)<<32); \
} while(0)
static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
{
unsigned long long start, end;
unsigned long long ret;
unsigned long gcd_res;
rdtscll(start);
gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
rdtscll(end);
if (end >= start)
ret = end - start;
else
ret = ~0ULL - start + 1 + end;
*res = gcd_res;
return ret;
}
#else
static inline struct timespec read_time(void)
{
struct timespec time;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &time);
return time;
}
static inline unsigned long long diff_time(struct timespec start, struct timespec end)
{
struct timespec temp;
if ((end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) < 0) {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec - 1;
temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000ULL + end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
} else {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec;
temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
}
return temp.tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + temp.tv_nsec;
}
static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
{
struct timespec start, end;
unsigned long gcd_res;
start = read_time();
gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
end = read_time();
*res = gcd_res;
return diff_time(start, end);
}
#endif
static inline unsigned long get_rand()
{
if (sizeof(long) == 8)
return (unsigned long)rand() << 32 | rand();
else
return rand();
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
unsigned int seed = time(0);
int loops = 100;
int repeats = 1000;
unsigned long (*res)[TEST_ENTRIES];
unsigned long long elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
int i, j, k;
for (;;) {
int opt = getopt(argc, argv, "n:r:s:");
/* End condition always first */
if (opt == -1)
break;
switch (opt) {
case 'n':
loops = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 'r':
repeats = atoi(optarg);
break;
case 's':
seed = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
break;
default:
/* You won't actually get here. */
break;
}
}
res = malloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * TEST_ENTRIES * loops);
memset(elapsed, 0, sizeof(elapsed));
srand(seed);
for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
unsigned long a = get_rand();
/* Do we have args? */
unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
unsigned long long min_elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
for (k = 0; k < repeats; k++) {
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
unsigned long long tmp = benchmark_gcd_func(gcd_func[i], a, b, &res[j][i]);
if (k == 0 || min_elapsed[i] > tmp)
min_elapsed[i] = tmp;
}
}
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
elapsed[i] += min_elapsed[i];
}
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
printf("gcd%d: elapsed %llu\n", i, elapsed[i]);
k = 0;
srand(seed);
for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
unsigned long a = get_rand();
unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
for (i = 1; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
if (res[j][i] != res[j][0])
break;
}
if (i < TEST_ENTRIES) {
if (k == 0) {
k = 1;
fprintf(stderr, "Error:\n");
}
fprintf(stderr, "gcd(%lu, %lu): ", a, b);
for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
fprintf(stderr, "%ld%s", res[j][i], i < TEST_ENTRIES - 1 ? ", " : "\n");
}
}
if (k == 0)
fprintf(stderr, "PASS\n");
free(res);
return 0;
}
Compiled with "-O2", on "VirtualBox 4.4.0-22-generic #38-Ubuntu x86_64" got:
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 10174
gcd1: elapsed 2120
gcd2: elapsed 2902
gcd3: elapsed 2039
gcd4: elapsed 2812
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9309
gcd1: elapsed 2280
gcd2: elapsed 2822
gcd3: elapsed 2217
gcd4: elapsed 2710
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9589
gcd1: elapsed 2098
gcd2: elapsed 2815
gcd3: elapsed 2030
gcd4: elapsed 2718
PASS
zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
gcd0: elapsed 9914
gcd1: elapsed 2309
gcd2: elapsed 2779
gcd3: elapsed 2228
gcd4: elapsed 2709
PASS
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid #defining a CONFIG_ variable]
Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-05-21 03:03:57 +03:00
select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
2006-08-28 15:51:20 +04:00
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_32v5
bool
2011-01-17 18:53:56 +03:00
select CPU_USE_DOMAINS if MMU
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
select NEED_KUSER_HELPERS
2014-04-23 01:26:27 +04:00
select TLS_REG_EMUL if SMP || !MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_32v6
bool
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select TLS_REG_EMUL if !CPU_32v6K && !MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
2011-01-17 18:08:32 +03:00
config CPU_32v6K
2011-01-15 19:25:04 +03:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
2007-05-09 01:45:26 +04:00
config CPU_32v7
bool
2013-03-22 00:02:37 +04:00
config CPU_32v7M
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# The abort model
2006-09-28 16:46:16 +04:00
config CPU_ABRT_NOMMU
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_ABRT_EV4
bool
config CPU_ABRT_EV4T
bool
config CPU_ABRT_LV4T
bool
config CPU_ABRT_EV5T
bool
config CPU_ABRT_EV5TJ
bool
config CPU_ABRT_EV6
bool
2007-05-09 01:45:26 +04:00
config CPU_ABRT_EV7
bool
2009-09-25 16:39:47 +04:00
config CPU_PABRT_LEGACY
2008-04-19 01:43:07 +04:00
bool
2009-09-25 16:39:47 +04:00
config CPU_PABRT_V6
bool
config CPU_PABRT_V7
2008-04-19 01:43:07 +04:00
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# The cache model
config CPU_CACHE_V4
bool
config CPU_CACHE_V4WT
bool
config CPU_CACHE_V4WB
bool
config CPU_CACHE_V6
bool
2007-05-09 01:45:26 +04:00
config CPU_CACHE_V7
bool
2013-03-22 00:02:37 +04:00
config CPU_CACHE_NOP
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_CACHE_VIVT
bool
config CPU_CACHE_VIPT
bool
2009-03-25 14:10:01 +03:00
config CPU_CACHE_FA
bool
2016-08-30 19:31:22 +03:00
config CPU_CACHE_V7M
bool
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
if MMU
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
# The copy-page model
config CPU_COPY_V4WT
bool
config CPU_COPY_V4WB
bool
2008-04-24 09:31:45 +04:00
config CPU_COPY_FEROCEON
bool
2009-03-25 14:10:01 +03:00
config CPU_COPY_FA
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_COPY_V6
bool
# This selects the TLB model
config CPU_TLB_V4WT
bool
help
ARM Architecture Version 4 TLB with writethrough cache.
config CPU_TLB_V4WB
bool
help
ARM Architecture Version 4 TLB with writeback cache.
config CPU_TLB_V4WBI
bool
help
ARM Architecture Version 4 TLB with writeback cache and invalidate
instruction cache entry.
2008-06-23 00:45:04 +04:00
config CPU_TLB_FEROCEON
bool
help
Feroceon TLB (v4wbi with non-outer-cachable page table walks).
2009-03-25 14:10:01 +03:00
config CPU_TLB_FA
bool
help
Faraday ARM FA526 architecture, unified TLB with writeback cache
and invalidate instruction cache entry. Branch target buffer is
also supported.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_TLB_V6
bool
2007-05-18 14:25:31 +04:00
config CPU_TLB_V7
bool
2009-08-12 01:58:49 +04:00
config VERIFY_PERMISSION_FAULT
bool
2006-06-22 01:26:29 +04:00
endif
2007-05-17 13:19:23 +04:00
config CPU_HAS_ASID
bool
help
This indicates whether the CPU has the ASID register; used to
tag TLB and possibly cache entries.
[ARM] nommu: defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU
By merging of uClinux/ARM, we need to treat various CPU cores which have
MMU, MPU or even none for memory management. The memory management
coprocessors are controlled by CP15 register set and the ARM core family
can be categorized by 5 groups by the register ;
G-a. CP15 is MMU : 610, 710, 720, 920, 922, 925, 926, 1020, 1020e, 1022,
v6 and the derivations sa1100, sa110, xscale, xsc3.
G-b. CP15 is MPU : 740, 940, 946, 996, 1156.
G-c. CP15 is MPU or MMU : 1026 (selectable by schematic design)
G-d. CP15 is exist, but nothing for memory managemnt : 966, 968.
G-e. no-CP15 : 7tdmi, 9tdmi, 9e, 9ej
This patch defines CPU_CP15, CPU_CP15_MMU and CPU_CP15_MPU. Thus the
family can be defined as :
- CPU_CP15 only : G-d
- CPU_CP15_MMU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-a, G-c(selectable)
- CPU_CP15_MPU(implies CPU_CP15) : G-b, G-c(selectable)
- !CPU_CP15 : G-e
Signed-off-by: Hyok S. Choi <hyok.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-26 12:36:37 +04:00
config CPU_CP15
bool
help
Processor has the CP15 register.
config CPU_CP15_MMU
bool
select CPU_CP15
help
Processor has the CP15 register, which has MMU related registers.
config CPU_CP15_MPU
bool
select CPU_CP15
help
Processor has the CP15 register, which has MPU related registers.
2010-09-13 19:03:21 +04:00
config CPU_USE_DOMAINS
bool
help
This option enables or disables the use of domain switching
via the set_fs() function.
2015-04-10 11:46:46 +03:00
config CPU_V7M_NUM_IRQ
int "Number of external interrupts connected to the NVIC"
depends on CPU_V7M
default 90 if ARCH_STM32
default 38 if ARCH_EFM32
2015-05-20 02:16:46 +03:00
default 112 if SOC_VF610
2015-04-10 11:46:46 +03:00
default 240
help
This option indicates the number of interrupts connected to the NVIC.
The value can be larger than the real number of interrupts supported
by the system, but must not be lower.
The default value is 240, corresponding to the maximum number of
interrupts supported by the NVIC on Cortex-M family.
If unsure, keep default value.
2006-03-29 00:00:40 +04:00
#
# CPU supports 36-bit I/O
#
config IO_36
bool
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
comment "Processor Features"
2011-11-22 21:30:32 +04:00
config ARM_LPAE
bool "Support for the Large Physical Address Extension"
2012-02-14 19:33:27 +04:00
depends on MMU && CPU_32v7 && !CPU_32v6 && !CPU_32v5 && \
!CPU_32v4 && !CPU_32v3
2018-04-03 17:24:20 +03:00
select PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
2011-11-22 21:30:32 +04:00
help
Say Y if you have an ARMv7 processor supporting the LPAE page
table format and you would like to access memory beyond the
4GB limit. The resulting kernel image will not run on
processors without the LPA extension.
If unsure, say N.
2015-04-04 18:58:38 +03:00
config ARM_PV_FIXUP
def_bool y
depends on ARM_LPAE && ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT && ARCH_KEYSTONE
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config ARM_THUMB
2017-05-19 18:35:56 +03:00
bool "Support Thumb user binaries" if !CPU_THUMBONLY && EXPERT
2017-02-09 15:00:16 +03:00
depends on CPU_THUMB_CAPABLE
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
default y
help
Say Y if you want to include kernel support for running user space
Thumb binaries.
The Thumb instruction set is a compressed form of the standard ARM
instruction set resulting in smaller binaries at the expense of
slightly less efficient code.
2017-05-19 18:35:56 +03:00
If this option is disabled, and you run userspace that switches to
Thumb mode, signal handling will not work correctly, resulting in
segmentation faults or illegal instruction aborts.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
If you don't know what this all is, saying Y is a safe choice.
2008-04-19 01:43:06 +04:00
config ARM_THUMBEE
bool "Enable ThumbEE CPU extension"
depends on CPU_V7
help
Say Y here if you have a CPU with the ThumbEE extension and code to
make use of it. Say N for code that can run on CPUs without ThumbEE.
2012-02-17 20:54:28 +04:00
config ARM_VIRT_EXT
2013-01-09 18:29:33 +04:00
bool
default y if CPU_V7
2012-02-17 20:54:28 +04:00
help
Enable the kernel to make use of the ARM Virtualization
Extensions to install hypervisors without run-time firmware
assistance.
A compliant bootloader is required in order to make maximum
use of this feature. Refer to Documentation/arm/Booting for
details.
2010-09-16 21:00:47 +04:00
config SWP_EMULATE
2014-07-04 17:44:36 +04:00
bool "Emulate SWP/SWPB instructions" if !SMP
2014-02-07 22:12:27 +04:00
depends on CPU_V7
2010-09-16 21:00:47 +04:00
default y if SMP
ARM: config: sort select statements alphanumerically
As suggested by Andrew Morton:
This is a pet peeve of mine. Any time there's a long list of items
(header file inclusions, kconfig entries, array initalisers, etc) and
someone wants to add a new item, they *always* go and stick it at the
end of the list.
Guys, don't do this. Either put the new item into a randomly-chosen
position or, probably better, alphanumerically sort the list.
lets sort all our select statements alphanumerically. This commit was
created by the following perl:
while (<>) {
while (/\\\s*$/) {
$_ .= <>;
}
undef %selects if /^\s*config\s+/;
if (/^\s+select\s+(\w+).*/) {
if (defined($selects{$1})) {
if ($selects{$1} eq $_) {
print STDERR "Warning: removing duplicated $1 entry\n";
} else {
print STDERR "Error: $1 differently selected\n".
"\tOld: $selects{$1}\n".
"\tNew: $_\n";
exit 1;
}
}
$selects{$1} = $_;
next;
}
if (%selects and (/^\s*$/ or /^\s+help/ or /^\s+---help---/ or
/^endif/ or /^endchoice/)) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
undef %selects;
}
print;
}
if (%selects) {
foreach $k (sort (keys %selects)) {
print "$selects{$k}";
}
}
It found two duplicates:
Warning: removing duplicated S5P_SETUP_MIPIPHY entry
Warning: removing duplicated HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND entry
and they are identical duplicates, hence the shrinkage in the diffstat
of two lines.
We have four testers reporting success of this change (Tony, Stephen,
Linus and Sekhar.)
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-10-06 20:12:25 +04:00
select HAVE_PROC_CPU if PROC_FS
2010-09-16 21:00:47 +04:00
help
ARMv6 architecture deprecates use of the SWP/SWPB instructions.
ARMv7 multiprocessing extensions introduce the ability to disable
these instructions, triggering an undefined instruction exception
when executed. Say Y here to enable software emulation of these
instructions for userspace (not kernel) using LDREX/STREX.
Also creates /proc/cpu/swp_emulation for statistics.
In some older versions of glibc [<=2.8] SWP is used during futex
trylock() operations with the assumption that the code will not
be preempted. This invalid assumption may be more likely to fail
with SWP emulation enabled, leading to deadlock of the user
application.
NOTE: when accessing uncached shared regions, LDREX/STREX rely
on an external transaction monitoring block called a global
monitor to maintain update atomicity. If your system does not
implement a global monitor, this option can cause programs that
perform SWP operations to uncached memory to deadlock.
If unsure, say Y.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
bool "Build big-endian kernel"
depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN
help
Say Y if you plan on running a kernel in big-endian mode.
Note that your board must be properly built and your board
port must properly enable any big-endian related features
of your chipset/board/processor.
2009-05-30 17:00:18 +04:00
config CPU_ENDIAN_BE8
bool
depends on CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
2011-01-17 18:08:32 +03:00
default CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7
2009-05-30 17:00:18 +04:00
help
Support for the BE-8 (big-endian) mode on ARMv6 and ARMv7 processors.
config CPU_ENDIAN_BE32
bool
depends on CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
default !CPU_ENDIAN_BE8
help
Support for the BE-32 (big-endian) mode on pre-ARMv6 processors.
2006-09-28 16:46:34 +04:00
config CPU_HIGH_VECTOR
2007-02-17 21:05:24 +03:00
depends on !MMU && CPU_CP15 && !CPU_ARM740T
2006-09-28 16:46:34 +04:00
bool "Select the High exception vector"
help
Say Y here to select high exception vector(0xFFFF0000~).
2012-04-12 20:12:37 +04:00
The exception vector can vary depending on the platform
2006-09-28 16:46:34 +04:00
design in nommu mode. If your platform needs to select
high exception vector, say Y.
Otherwise or if you are unsure, say N, and the low exception
vector (0x00000000~) will be used.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE
2006-09-26 12:36:37 +04:00
bool "Disable I-Cache (I-bit)"
2016-08-30 19:31:22 +03:00
depends on (CPU_CP15 && !(CPU_ARM720T || CPU_ARM740T || CPU_XSCALE || CPU_XSC3)) || CPU_V7M
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
Say Y here to disable the processor instruction cache. Unless
you have a reason not to or are unsure, say N.
config CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE
2006-09-26 12:36:37 +04:00
bool "Disable D-Cache (C-bit)"
2016-08-30 19:31:22 +03:00
depends on (CPU_CP15 && !SMP) || CPU_V7M
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
Say Y here to disable the processor data cache. Unless
you have a reason not to or are unsure, say N.
2006-09-26 12:38:32 +04:00
config CPU_DCACHE_SIZE
hex
depends on CPU_ARM740T || CPU_ARM946E
default 0x00001000 if CPU_ARM740T
default 0x00002000 # default size for ARM946E-S
help
Some cores are synthesizable to have various sized cache. For
ARM946E-S case, it can vary from 0KB to 1MB.
To support such cache operations, it is efficient to know the size
before compile time.
If your SoC is configured to have a different size, define the value
here with proper conditions.
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
config CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH
bool "Force write through D-cache"
2009-03-25 14:10:01 +03:00
depends on (CPU_ARM740T || CPU_ARM920T || CPU_ARM922T || CPU_ARM925T || CPU_ARM926T || CPU_ARM940T || CPU_ARM946E || CPU_ARM1020 || CPU_FA526) && !CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
default y if CPU_ARM925T
help
Say Y here to use the data cache in writethrough mode. Unless you
specifically require this or are unsure, say N.
config CPU_CACHE_ROUND_ROBIN
bool "Round robin I and D cache replacement algorithm"
2006-09-26 12:38:32 +04:00
depends on (CPU_ARM926T || CPU_ARM946E || CPU_ARM1020) && (!CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE || !CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE)
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
Say Y here to use the predictable round-robin cache replacement
policy. Unless you specifically require this or are unsure, say N.
config CPU_BPREDICT_DISABLE
bool "Disable branch prediction"
2016-08-30 19:31:22 +03:00
depends on CPU_ARM1020 || CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_MOHAWK || CPU_XSC3 || CPU_V7 || CPU_FA526 || CPU_V7M
2005-04-17 02:20:36 +04:00
help
Say Y here to disable branch prediction. If unsure, say N.
2005-04-30 01:08:33 +04:00
2018-05-14 13:56:36 +03:00
config CPU_SPECTRE
bool
2018-04-20 12:06:27 +03:00
config HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR
bool "Harden the branch predictor against aliasing attacks" if EXPERT
depends on CPU_SPECTRE
default y
help
Speculation attacks against some high-performance processors rely
on being able to manipulate the branch predictor for a victim
context by executing aliasing branches in the attacker context.
Such attacks can be partially mitigated against by clearing
internal branch predictor state and limiting the prediction
logic in some situations.
This config option will take CPU-specific actions to harden
the branch predictor against aliasing attacks and may rely on
specific instruction sequences or control bits being set by
the system firmware.
If unsure, say Y.
2005-05-06 02:24:45 +04:00
config TLS_REG_EMUL
bool
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
select NEED_KUSER_HELPERS
2005-05-06 02:24:45 +04:00
help
2005-05-12 22:27:12 +04:00
An SMP system using a pre-ARMv6 processor (there are apparently
a few prototypes like that in existence) and therefore access to
that required register must be emulated.
2005-05-06 02:24:45 +04:00
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
config NEED_KUSER_HELPERS
bool
config KUSER_HELPERS
bool "Enable kuser helpers in vector page" if !NEED_KUSER_HELPERS
2014-11-11 01:46:27 +03:00
depends on MMU
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
default y
help
Warning: disabling this option may break user programs.
Provide kuser helpers in the vector page. The kernel provides
helper code to userspace in read only form at a fixed location
in the high vector page to allow userspace to be independent of
the CPU type fitted to the system. This permits binaries to be
run on ARMv4 through to ARMv7 without modification.
2013-08-15 01:36:32 +04:00
See Documentation/arm/kernel_user_helpers.txt for details.
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
However, the fixed address nature of these helpers can be used
by ROP (return orientated programming) authors when creating
exploits.
If all of the binaries and libraries which run on your platform
are built specifically for your platform, and make no use of
2013-08-15 01:36:32 +04:00
these helpers, then you can turn this option off to hinder
such exploits. However, in that case, if a binary or library
relying on those helpers is run, it will receive a SIGILL signal,
which will terminate the program.
2013-07-23 21:37:00 +04:00
Say N here only if you are absolutely certain that you do not
need these helpers; otherwise, the safe option is to say Y.
2015-03-25 21:16:05 +03:00
config VDSO
bool "Enable VDSO for acceleration of some system calls"
2015-04-17 23:51:38 +03:00
depends on AEABI && MMU && CPU_V7
2015-03-25 21:16:05 +03:00
default y if ARM_ARCH_TIMER
select GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL
help
Place in the process address space an ELF shared object
providing fast implementations of gettimeofday and
clock_gettime. Systems that implement the ARM architected
timer will receive maximum benefit.
You must have glibc 2.22 or later for programs to seamlessly
take advantage of this.
2010-06-21 18:10:07 +04:00
config DMA_CACHE_RWFO
bool "Enable read/write for ownership DMA cache maintenance"
2011-01-18 16:30:33 +03:00
depends on CPU_V6K && SMP
2010-06-21 18:10:07 +04:00
default y
help
The Snoop Control Unit on ARM11MPCore does not detect the
cache maintenance operations and the dma_{map,unmap}_area()
functions may leave stale cache entries on other CPUs. By
enabling this option, Read or Write For Ownership in the ARMv6
DMA cache maintenance functions is performed. These LDR/STR
instructions change the cache line state to shared or modified
so that the cache operation has the desired effect.
Note that the workaround is only valid on processors that do
not perform speculative loads into the D-cache. For such
processors, if cache maintenance operations are not broadcast
in hardware, other workarounds are needed (e.g. cache
maintenance broadcasting in software via FIQ).
2007-02-05 16:48:08 +03:00
config OUTER_CACHE
bool
2007-02-05 16:48:19 +03:00
2010-03-24 18:47:53 +03:00
config OUTER_CACHE_SYNC
bool
ARM: move heavy barrier support out of line
The existing memory barrier macro causes a significant amount of code
to be inserted inline at every call site. For example, in
gpio_set_irq_type(), we have this for mb():
c0344c08: f57ff04e dsb st
c0344c0c: e59f8190 ldr r8, [pc, #400] ; c0344da4 <gpio_set_irq_type+0x230>
c0344c10: e3590004 cmp r9, #4
c0344c14: e5983014 ldr r3, [r8, #20]
c0344c18: 0a000054 beq c0344d70 <gpio_set_irq_type+0x1fc>
c0344c1c: e3530000 cmp r3, #0
c0344c20: 0a000004 beq c0344c38 <gpio_set_irq_type+0xc4>
c0344c24: e50b2030 str r2, [fp, #-48] ; 0xffffffd0
c0344c28: e50bc034 str ip, [fp, #-52] ; 0xffffffcc
c0344c2c: e12fff33 blx r3
c0344c30: e51bc034 ldr ip, [fp, #-52] ; 0xffffffcc
c0344c34: e51b2030 ldr r2, [fp, #-48] ; 0xffffffd0
c0344c38: e5963004 ldr r3, [r6, #4]
Moving the outer_cache_sync() call out of line reduces the impact of
the barrier:
c0344968: f57ff04e dsb st
c034496c: e35a0004 cmp sl, #4
c0344970: e50b2030 str r2, [fp, #-48] ; 0xffffffd0
c0344974: 0a000044 beq c0344a8c <gpio_set_irq_type+0x1b8>
c0344978: ebf363dd bl c001d8f4 <arm_heavy_mb>
c034497c: e5953004 ldr r3, [r5, #4]
This should reduce the cache footprint of this code. Overall, this
results in a reduction of around 20K in the kernel size:
text data bss dec hex filename
10773970 667392 10369656 21811018 14ccf4a ../build/imx6/vmlinux-old
10754219 667392 10369656 21791267 14c8223 ../build/imx6/vmlinux-new
Another advantage to this approach is that we can finally resolve the
issue of SoCs which have their own memory barrier requirements within
multiplatform kernels (such as OMAP.) Here, the bus interconnects
need additional handling to ensure that writes become visible in the
correct order (eg, between dma_map() operations, writes to DMA
coherent memory, and MMIO accesses.)
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2015-06-02 01:44:46 +03:00
select ARM_HEAVY_MB
2010-03-24 18:47:53 +03:00
help
The outer cache has a outer_cache_fns.sync function pointer
that can be used to drain the write buffer of the outer cache.
2017-12-01 03:10:09 +03:00
config CACHE_B15_RAC
bool "Enable the Broadcom Brahma-B15 read-ahead cache controller"
depends on ARCH_BRCMSTB
default y
help
This option enables the Broadcom Brahma-B15 read-ahead cache
controller. If disabled, the read-ahead cache remains off.
2008-06-23 00:45:04 +04:00
config CACHE_FEROCEON_L2
bool "Enable the Feroceon L2 cache controller"
2014-07-11 01:36:21 +04:00
depends on ARCH_MV78XX0 || ARCH_MVEBU
2008-06-23 00:45:04 +04:00
default y
select OUTER_CACHE
help
This option enables the Feroceon L2 cache controller.
2008-09-23 16:28:10 +04:00
config CACHE_FEROCEON_L2_WRITETHROUGH
bool "Force Feroceon L2 cache write through"
depends on CACHE_FEROCEON_L2
help
Say Y here to use the Feroceon L2 cache in writethrough mode.
Unless you specifically require this, say N for writeback mode.
2011-11-29 19:56:19 +04:00
config MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
bool
help
This option should be selected by machines which have a L2x0
or PL310 cache controller, but where its use is optional.
The only effect of this option is to make CACHE_L2X0 and
related options available to the user for configuration.
Boards or SoCs which always require the cache controller
support to be present should select CACHE_L2X0 directly
instead of this option, thus preventing the user from
inadvertently configuring a broken kernel.
2007-02-05 16:48:19 +03:00
config CACHE_L2X0
2011-11-29 19:56:19 +04:00
bool "Enable the L2x0 outer cache controller" if MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
default MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
2007-02-05 16:48:19 +03:00
select OUTER_CACHE
2010-03-24 18:48:53 +03:00
select OUTER_CACHE_SYNC
2008-04-19 01:43:17 +04:00
help
This option enables the L2x0 PrimeCell.
2008-06-06 12:34:03 +04:00
2016-09-02 12:35:18 +03:00
config CACHE_L2X0_PMU
bool "L2x0 performance monitor support" if CACHE_L2X0
depends on PERF_EVENTS
help
This option enables support for the performance monitoring features
of the L220 and PL310 outer cache controllers.
2014-06-19 13:19:10 +04:00
if CACHE_L2X0
2014-03-16 16:12:11 +04:00
config PL310_ERRATA_588369
bool "PL310 errata: Clean & Invalidate maintenance operations do not invalidate clean lines"
help
The PL310 L2 cache controller implements three types of Clean &
Invalidate maintenance operations: by Physical Address
(offset 0x7F0), by Index/Way (0x7F8) and by Way (0x7FC).
They are architecturally defined to behave as the execution of a
clean operation followed immediately by an invalidate operation,
both performing to the same memory location. This functionality
2014-07-08 05:59:42 +04:00
is not correctly implemented in PL310 prior to r2p0 (fixed in r2p0)
as clean lines are not invalidated as a result of these operations.
2014-03-16 16:12:11 +04:00
config PL310_ERRATA_727915
bool "PL310 errata: Background Clean & Invalidate by Way operation can cause data corruption"
help
PL310 implements the Clean & Invalidate by Way L2 cache maintenance
operation (offset 0x7FC). This operation runs in background so that
PL310 can handle normal accesses while it is in progress. Under very
rare circumstances, due to this erratum, write data can be lost when
PL310 treats a cacheable write transaction during a Clean &
2014-07-08 05:59:42 +04:00
Invalidate by Way operation. Revisions prior to r3p1 are affected by
this errata (fixed in r3p1).
2014-03-16 16:12:11 +04:00
config PL310_ERRATA_753970
bool "PL310 errata: cache sync operation may be faulty"
help
This option enables the workaround for the 753970 PL310 (r3p0) erratum.
Under some condition the effect of cache sync operation on
the store buffer still remains when the operation completes.
This means that the store buffer is always asked to drain and
this prevents it from merging any further writes. The workaround
is to replace the normal offset of cache sync operation (0x730)
by another offset targeting an unmapped PL310 register 0x740.
This has the same effect as the cache sync operation: store buffer
drain and waiting for all buffers empty.
config PL310_ERRATA_769419
bool "PL310 errata: no automatic Store Buffer drain"
help
On revisions of the PL310 prior to r3p2, the Store Buffer does
not automatically drain. This can cause normal, non-cacheable
writes to be retained when the memory system is idle, leading
to suboptimal I/O performance for drivers using coherent DMA.
This option adds a write barrier to the cpu_idle loop so that,
on systems with an outer cache, the store buffer is drained
explicitly.
2014-06-19 13:19:10 +04:00
endif
2009-11-24 20:33:52 +03:00
config CACHE_TAUROS2
bool "Enable the Tauros2 L2 cache controller"
2010-11-24 06:54:21 +03:00
depends on (ARCH_DOVE || ARCH_MMP || CPU_PJ4)
2009-11-24 20:33:52 +03:00
default y
select OUTER_CACHE
help
This option enables the Tauros2 L2 cache controller (as
found on PJ1/PJ4).
2015-10-02 07:42:19 +03:00
config CACHE_UNIPHIER
bool "Enable the UniPhier outer cache controller"
depends on ARCH_UNIPHIER
2016-10-31 16:37:13 +03:00
select ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_7
2015-10-02 07:42:19 +03:00
select OUTER_CACHE
select OUTER_CACHE_SYNC
help
This option enables the UniPhier outer cache (system cache)
controller.
2008-06-06 12:34:03 +04:00
config CACHE_XSC3L2
bool "Enable the L2 cache on XScale3"
depends on CPU_XSC3
default y
select OUTER_CACHE
help
This option enables the L2 cache on XScale3.
2009-09-15 13:23:53 +04:00
2011-02-14 18:55:45 +03:00
config ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_6
bool
2012-01-20 15:01:10 +04:00
default y if CPU_V7
2011-02-14 18:55:45 +03:00
help
Setting ARM L1 cache line size to 64 Bytes.
2016-10-31 16:37:13 +03:00
config ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_7
bool
help
Setting ARM L1 cache line size to 128 Bytes.
2009-09-15 13:23:53 +04:00
config ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
int
2016-10-31 16:37:13 +03:00
default 7 if ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_7
2010-02-22 02:02:59 +03:00
default 6 if ARM_L1_CACHE_SHIFT_6
2009-09-15 13:23:53 +04:00
default 5
2010-05-15 14:02:43 +04:00
config ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
2017-05-24 13:24:31 +03:00
bool "Use non-cacheable memory for DMA" if (CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7M) && !CPU_V7
default y if CPU_V6 || CPU_V6K || CPU_V7 || CPU_V7M
2010-05-15 14:02:43 +04:00
help
Historically, the kernel has used strongly ordered mappings to
provide DMA coherent memory. With the advent of ARMv7, mapping
memory with differing types results in unpredictable behaviour,
so on these CPUs, this option is forced on.
Multiple mappings with differing attributes is also unpredictable
on ARMv6 CPUs, but since they do not have aggressive speculative
prefetch, no harm appears to occur.
However, drivers may be missing the necessary barriers for ARMv6,
and therefore turning this on may result in unpredictable driver
behaviour. Therefore, we offer this as an option.
2017-05-24 13:24:31 +03:00
On some of the beefier ARMv7-M machines (with DMA and write
buffers) you likely want this enabled, while those that
didn't need it until now also won't need it in the future.
2010-05-15 14:02:43 +04:00
You are recommended say 'Y' here and debug any affected drivers.
2010-05-17 20:24:04 +04:00
ARM: move heavy barrier support out of line
The existing memory barrier macro causes a significant amount of code
to be inserted inline at every call site. For example, in
gpio_set_irq_type(), we have this for mb():
c0344c08: f57ff04e dsb st
c0344c0c: e59f8190 ldr r8, [pc, #400] ; c0344da4 <gpio_set_irq_type+0x230>
c0344c10: e3590004 cmp r9, #4
c0344c14: e5983014 ldr r3, [r8, #20]
c0344c18: 0a000054 beq c0344d70 <gpio_set_irq_type+0x1fc>
c0344c1c: e3530000 cmp r3, #0
c0344c20: 0a000004 beq c0344c38 <gpio_set_irq_type+0xc4>
c0344c24: e50b2030 str r2, [fp, #-48] ; 0xffffffd0
c0344c28: e50bc034 str ip, [fp, #-52] ; 0xffffffcc
c0344c2c: e12fff33 blx r3
c0344c30: e51bc034 ldr ip, [fp, #-52] ; 0xffffffcc
c0344c34: e51b2030 ldr r2, [fp, #-48] ; 0xffffffd0
c0344c38: e5963004 ldr r3, [r6, #4]
Moving the outer_cache_sync() call out of line reduces the impact of
the barrier:
c0344968: f57ff04e dsb st
c034496c: e35a0004 cmp sl, #4
c0344970: e50b2030 str r2, [fp, #-48] ; 0xffffffd0
c0344974: 0a000044 beq c0344a8c <gpio_set_irq_type+0x1b8>
c0344978: ebf363dd bl c001d8f4 <arm_heavy_mb>
c034497c: e5953004 ldr r3, [r5, #4]
This should reduce the cache footprint of this code. Overall, this
results in a reduction of around 20K in the kernel size:
text data bss dec hex filename
10773970 667392 10369656 21811018 14ccf4a ../build/imx6/vmlinux-old
10754219 667392 10369656 21791267 14c8223 ../build/imx6/vmlinux-new
Another advantage to this approach is that we can finally resolve the
issue of SoCs which have their own memory barrier requirements within
multiplatform kernels (such as OMAP.) Here, the bus interconnects
need additional handling to ensure that writes become visible in the
correct order (eg, between dma_map() operations, writes to DMA
coherent memory, and MMIO accesses.)
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2015-06-02 01:44:46 +03:00
config ARM_HEAVY_MB
bool
2013-02-01 13:41:37 +04:00
config ARCH_SUPPORTS_BIG_ENDIAN
bool
help
This option specifies the architecture can support big endian
operation.
2014-04-04 04:28:11 +04:00
2016-01-26 03:19:36 +03:00
config DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA
bool "Make rodata strictly non-executable"
2017-02-07 03:31:58 +03:00
depends on STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
2014-04-04 00:29:50 +04:00
default y
help
2016-01-26 03:19:36 +03:00
If this is set, rodata will be made explicitly non-executable. This
provides protection on the rare chance that attackers might find and
use ROP gadgets that exist in the rodata section. This adds an
additional section-aligned split of rodata from kernel text so it
can be made explicitly non-executable. This padding may waste memory
space to gain the additional protection.