IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Due to how xe_dss_mask_t is implemented, the type is a pointer. Since
this is only used for looking up the bits, make it const so it can be
used together with a const gt passed around.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Replace the inline function with a _Generic() so gt_to_xe() can work
with a const struct xe_gt*, which leads to a const struct xe *.
This allows a const gt being passed around and when the xe device is
needed, compiler won't issue a warning that calling gt_to_xe() would
discard the const. Rather, just propagate the const to the xe pointer
being returned.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Add a sentence about the initialization so it's clear for newcomers how
to tweak the init functions for new platforms.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Some register ranges with replication type L3BANK were missing from the
driver table. The following warning was triggering when adding a
workaround touching the register 0xb188:
xe 0000:03:00.0: Did not find MCR register 0xb188 in any MCR steering table
Add the L3BANK ranges according to the spec.
v2:
- Fix typo in one of the ranges: s/0x00BCFF/0x008CFF/ (Matt Roper)
- Add termination rule in the init function for L3BANK (Matt Roper)
Bspec: 66534
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
For Xe_HP platforms that can have multiple CCS engines, the
presence/absence of each CCS is inferred by the presence/absence of any
DSS in the corresponding quadrant of the GT's DSS mask.
This handling is only needed on platforms that can have more than one
CCS. The CCS is never fused off on platforms like MTL that can only
have one.
v2:
- Add extra warnings to try to catch mistakes where the register counts
in get_num_dss_regs() are updated without corresponding updates to
the register parameters passed to load_dss_mask(). (Lucas)
- Add kerneldoc for xe_gt_topology_has_dss_in_quadrant() and clarify
why we care about quadrants of the DSS space. (Lucas)
- Ensure CCS engine counting treats engine mask as 64-bit. (Lucas)
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309005530.3140173-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The single function to handle fuse registers for all types of engines is
becoming a bit long and hard to follow (and we haven't even added the
compute engines yet). Let's split it into dedicated functions for each
engine class.
v2:
- Add note about BCS0 always being present. (Bala)
- Add forcewake assertion to read_copy_fuses. (Bala)
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230309005530.3140173-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
This seems to be the preferred nomenclature in xe. Currently we are
intermixing vram and lmem, which is confusing.
v2 (Gwan-gyeong Mun & Lucas):
- Rather apply to the entire driver
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Checking whether a single engine's register save/restore entries
overflow the expected/pre-allocated GuC ADS regset area isn't terribly
useful; we actually want to check whether the combined entries from all
engines on the GT overflow the regset space.
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308005509.2975663-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The address set by firmware in GEN12_DSMBASE in driver initialization
doesn't mean "anything above that and until end of lmem is part of DSM".
In fact, there may be a few KB that is not part of DSM on the end of
lmem. How large is that space is platform-dependent, but since it's
always less than the DSM granularity, it can be simplified by simply
aligning the size down.
Suggested-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
It appears we don't hold a memory access reference for the accesses in
this test, which may results in printed warnings and possibly the GT
not woken up for the memory accesses.
Add a memory access reference around the test.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We currently don't have any tests that explicitly depends on this
config option, so remove that build dependency.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
When this register was added in xe for some workarounds, it was copied
from i915 before the registers got changed to add the MCR annotation.
The register 0xe4f4 is MCR since gen8, long before any GPU supported by
the xe driver. Replace all occurrences with the right register.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230306165757.633796-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The following warning shows up for TGL:
[drm:xe_reg_sr_add [xe]] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 6604 (clear: 00ff0000, set: 00040000, masked: no): ret=-22
[drm:xe_reg_sr_add [xe]] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 6604 (clear: 00ff0000, set: 00040000, masked: no): ret=-22
That is because the same register is being set both by the WAs and the
tunings. Like was done in i915, prefer the tuning over the workaround
since that is applicable for more platforms. Also fix the tuning: it
was incorrectly using the MCR version of the register, but that only
became true in XEHP.
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/233
Reported-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230306212450.803557-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_REGS was being used to calculate the size of
xe_eu_mask_t while it should use XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_REGS.
There are no know issues about this but fixing it anyways.
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fix typo as noticed by Matt Roper:
git grep -l persitent | xargs sed -i 's/persitent/persistent/g'
... and then fix coding style issues.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302013411.3262608-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
There's inconsistent use of mutex_init(), in xe_device_create(), with
several of them never calling mutex_destroy() in xe_device_destroy().
Migrate all of them to drmm_mutex_init(), so the destroy part is
automatically called.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230225002138.1759016-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
In the depths of ttm, when allocating the vma node this should result in
-ENOSPC it seems. However we should probably rather reject as part of
our own ioctl sanity checking, and then treat as programmer error in the
lower levels.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
With small-bar we likely want to annotate all the kernel users that
require CPU access with vram. If xe_bo_create_pin_map() is the central
place for that then we should have a central place to annotate.
This also simplifies the code and fixes what appears to be a double
xe_bo_put(hwe->hwsp) in the error handling.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The HAS_RENDER_L3CC is set unconditionally so there's no need to keep it
as a dedicated flag. For error checking purposes, we can just make sure
the 'table' field is initialized properly.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reprogramming the LNCF MOCS registers on render domain reset is not
intended to be regular driver programming, but rather the implementation
of a specific workaround (Wa_1607983814). This workaround no longer
applies on Xe_HP any beyond, so we can expect that these registers, like
the rest of the LNCF/LBCF registers, will maintain their values through
all engine resets. We should only add these registers to the GuC's
save/restore list on platforms that need the workaround.
Furthermore, xe_mocs_init_engine() appears to be another attempt to
satisfy this same workaround. This is unnecessary on the Xe driver
since even on platforms where the workaround is necessary, all
single-engine resets are initiated by the GuC and thus the GuC will take
care of saving/restoring these registers. The only host-initiated
resets we have in Xe are full GT resets which will already
(re)initialize these registers as part of the regular xe_mocs_init()
flow.
v2:
- Add needs_wa_1607983814() so that calculate_regset_size() doesn't
overallocate regset space when the workaround isn't needed. (Lucas)
- On platforms affected by Wa_1607983814, only add the LNCF MOCS
registers to the render engine's GuC save/restore list; resets of
other engines don't need to save/restore these.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
It was incorrectly using dg2_mocs for now.
v2 (MattR):
- Use REG_GENMASK/REG_FIELD_PREP for bitfields
- Add bspec references
Bspec: 45101, 45410, 63882
Signed-off-by: Philippe Lecluse <philippe.lecluse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The DG1 branch needlessly assigns uc_index twice. Drop the second
instance.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
The values in the xe_mocs_info_index enum only match old pre-gen12
hardware not supported by the Xe driver.
The only usage of this enum was to set a default value for
info->unused_entries_index, but this is unnecessary since every platform
in the subsequent switch statement sets a proper platform-specific value
(and the XE_MOCS_PTE default doesn't even make sense since the hardware
dropped the "use PAT settings" capability in gen12).
v2:
- Add a check that unusued_entries_index is non-zero; even for
platforms where this is a valid table entry, it's never the one we
want this value assigned to. (Lucas)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
RKL should use the same "gen12" MOCS handling as TGL/ADL-S/ADL-P.
Bspec: 45101
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
TGL/RKL/ADLS/ADLP are all supposed to use the same MOCS table, with
values defined in the bspec. Any entries listed in the bspec as
reserved/error/undefined should always be initialized to the most cached
and least coherent setting possible so that any userspace accidentally
referencing those undefined entries will only experience an increase in
coherency if spec updates down the road start defining real values.
The TGL and gen12 table entries defined in the driver today are
identical except that the TGL includes one additional (incorrect)
setting for table index 1. Furthermore, the TGL-specific initialization
does not define a dedicated value for info->unused_entries_index, so
this incorrect table entry 1 also gets used to populate the MOCS
registers for all reserved/unused table entries. This incorrect
behavior is a holdover from i915 where the platform was enabled with an
incorrect setting and by the time we noticed, it was too late to fix the
table without breaking ABI compatibility (and on TGL we did indeed have
some buggy userspace that was referencing the 'reserved' entry 1).
Since the Xe driver starts fresh with a clean slate on ABI, there's no
need to repeat the mistakes of i915 here.
v2:
- Reword/clarify commit message. (Lucas)
Bspec: 45101
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reduce the use of i915_reg_defs.h so it can be encapsulated in a single
place.
1) If it was being included by mistake, remove
2) If it was included for FIELD_GET()/FIELD_PREP()/GENMASK() and the
like, just include <linux/bitfield.h>
3) If it was included to be able to define additional registers, move
the registers to the relavant headers (regs/xe_regs.h or
regs/xe_gt_regs.h)
v2:
- Squash commit fixing i915_reg_defs.h include and with the one
introducing regs/xe_reg_defs.h
- Remove more cases of i915_reg_defs.h being used when all it was
needed was linux/bitfield.h (Matt Roper)
- Move some registers to the corresponding regs/*.h file (Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[Rodrigo squashed here the removal of the i915 include]
The only thing really needed is the base offset, MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB.
Remove the include and just define it inplace.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Move a few defines from xe_guc_pc.c to the right register, now that
there is one: xe_gt_regs.h.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Copy the macros used by xe in i915_reg.h to regs/xe_regs.h. A minimal
cleanup is done while copying so they adhere minimally to the coding
style. Further reordering and cleaning is left for later.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Copy the macros used by xe in intel_gpu_commands.h to
regs/xe_gpu_commands.h. PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS and
PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ARCH_FLAGS were already defined in
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c and only used there. So let that define
to be used instead of also adding to the new header.
v2: Let PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ENGINE_FLAGS/PIPE_CONTROL_3D_ARCH_FLAGS in the
only .c that uses it instead of redefining (Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Create regs/xe_lrc_layout.h file with all the offsets used by the xe
driver. Eventually the xe driver may use a different way to define them
since it doesn't supported below gen12.
v2: Rename file to intel_lrc_layout.h since it's not really about
registers (Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Create regs/xe_gt_regs.h file with all the registers and bit
definitions used by the xe driver. Eventually the registers may be
defined in a different way and since xe doesn't supported below gen12,
the number of registers touched is much smaller, so create a new header.
The definitions themselves are direct copy from the
gt/intel_gt_regs.h file, just sorting the registers by address.
Cleaning those up and adhering to a common coding style is left for
later.
v2: Make the change to MCR_REG location in a separate patch to go
through the i915 branch (Matt Roper / Rodrigo)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Create regs/xe_engine_regs.h file with all the registers and bit
definitions used by the xe driver. Eventually the registers may be
defined in a different way and since xe doesn't supported below gen12,
the number of registers touched is much smaller, so create a new header.
The definitions themselves are direct copy from the
gt/intel_engine_regs.h file, just sorting the registers by address.
Cleaning those up and adhering to a common coding style is left for
later.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Sort includes and split them in blocks:
1) .h corresponding to the .c. Example: xe_bb.c should have a "#include
"xe_bb.h" first.
2) #include <linux/...>
3) #include <drm/...>
4) local includes
5) i915 includes
This is accomplished by running
`clang-format --style=file -i --sort-includes drivers/gpu/drm/xe/*.[ch]`
and ignoring all the changes after the includes. There are also some
manual tweaks to split the blocks.
v2: Also sort includes in headers
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Starting with MTL, the GT forcewake ack register moved from 0x130044 to
0xDFC. We expect this change to carry forward to future platforms as
well, so forcewake initialization should use an IP version check instead
of matching the MTL platform specifically.
The (re)definition of FORCEWAKE_ACK_GT_MTL in the forcewake file is also
unnecessary; we can take the definition that already exists in the
dedicated register header.
Bspec: 65031, 64629
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
During early generations of Intel GPUs, hardware engines would sometimes
move to new MMIO offsets from one platform/generation to the next.
These days engines the hardware teams put more effort into ensuring that
engines stay at consistent locations; even major design changes (like
the introduction of standalone media) keep the MMIO locations of the
engines constant.
Since all platforms supported by the Xe driver are new enough to have a
single MMIO offset for each engine (and since our crystal ball says that
these offsets are very unlikely to change again in the foreseeable
future), we can simplify the driver's engine definitions and remove the
gen-based MMIO bases.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
In order to avoid -Werror=missing-prototypes, add the prototypes
in a separate tests/<test-name>_test.h file that is included by both
the implementation (tests/xe_<testname>.c, injected in xe.ko) and the
kunit module (tests/xe_<testname>_test.c -> xe-<testname>-test.ko).
v2: Add header and don't add ifdef to files that are already not built
when not using kunit (Matt Auld)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
In local_pci_probe() the core kernel increments the rpm for the device,
just before calling into the probe hook. If the driver/device supports
runtime pm it is then meant to put this ref during probe (like we do in
xe_pm_runtime_init()). However when removing the device we then also
need to take the reference back, otherwise the ref that is put in
pci_device_remove() will be unbalanced when for example unloading the
driver, leading to warnings like:
[ 3808.596345] xe 0000:03:00.0: Runtime PM usage count underflow!
Fix this by incrementing the rpm ref when removing the device.
v2:
- Improve the terminology in the commit message; s/drop/put/ etc (Lucas & Rodrigo)
- Also call pm_runtime_forbid(dev) (Rodrigo)
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/193
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
i915_regs.h is not needed, particularly in a header file. What is needed
is i915_reg_defs.h for use of _MMIO() and similar macros.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Use the more common "call cc-disable-warning" way to disable warnings.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
media_verx100 supersedes the info from media_ver. Leave media_ver in the
struct xe_device_desc, used in xe_pci.c since it's easier to define
common parts of the platforms like that. However all the rest of the
driver should be using media_verx100 that is more future proof.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/216
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Make xe_wait_user_fence.c include xe_wait_user_fence.h so it doesn't
rely on indirect includes and also doesn't fail the build due to missing
prototype for xe_wait_user_fence_ioctl().
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fix the following warning:
../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ttm_stolen_mgr.c:55: warning: Function
parameter or member 'xe' not described in
'xe_ttm_stolen_cpu_inaccessible'
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
xe_gt_topology_dss_group_mask and xe_gt_topology_count_dss are probably
leftover from initial implementation - they are not called from
anywhere. Remove those functions.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
LRC tunings were added after the gt ones and didn't add the call
in xe_gt_record_default_lrcs() to process them like is done for
workarounds. Add such a function and call it from
xe_gt_record_default_lrcs().
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
A few static functions not being declared like that break the build with
W=1, like e.g.
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:250: drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.o] Error 1
../drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc.c:240:6: error: no previous prototype for ‘guc_write_params’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
240 | void guc_write_params(struct xe_guc *guc)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Make them static.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
There are also some reserved fields in here which are not currently
cleared when handing back to userspace. Otherwise we might run into
issues if we later wish to use them.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
